Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 3, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, St. Louis Blues 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 52% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT181721300428
STL043101312519

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:32PITBryan RustAssists: Rutger McGroarty · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:39STLJake NeighboursAssists: Robert Thomas, Philip Broberg · Snap, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:22PITConnor DewarAssists: Rickard Rakell, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.30 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:48STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Nathan Walker · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:05STLJordan KyrouAssists: Cam Fowler · Snap, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:56STLJake NeighboursAssists: Jimmy Snuggerud, Oskar Sundqvist · Snap, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:15PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Matt Grzelcyk · Snap, 0.15 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:35PITRutger McGroartyAssists: Ville Koivunen, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:12STLRobert ThomasPPGWGAssists: Jordan Kyrou · Snap, 0.20 xG4–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:19PITVille Koivunen: Holding2 min
  2. P2 15:00PITErik Karlsson: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 16:22PITRyan Shea: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P3 10:45STLJustin Faulk: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. OT 1:28PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Thomas
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSTL
28Shots on goal19
3.0Expected goals2.8
55Shot attempts41
21Faceoffs won36
1Power plays5
10Penalty minutes2
20Hits22
11Blocked shots13
11Giveaways21
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – McGroarty11:55

    xG 0.77–0.44 (64%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  2. Hayes – Acciari – Tomasino6:03

    xG 0.06–0.28 (19%)attempts 3–3goals 0–2

  3. Rakell – Dewar – Koivunen11:10

    xG 0.10–0.37 (20%)attempts 4–13goals 0–1

  4. Heinen – Koppanen – Lizotte7:41

    xG 0.20–0.49 (30%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Timmins14:18

    xG 0.86–0.26 (76%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  2. Graves – Shea9:41

    xG 0.21–0.33 (39%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Grzelcyk16:44

    xG 0.41–0.84 (33%)attempts 14–10goals 0–2

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestFaksa – Walker – Toropchenko7:41

    xG 0.40–0.24 (62%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Buchnevich – Thomas – Neighbours7:07

    xG 0.35–0.34 (51%)attempts 8–4goals 1–1

  3. Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway3:31

    xG 0.06–0.13 (32%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Sundqvist – Bolduc – Snuggerud6:32

    xG 0.02–0.18 (9%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeddy – Fowler15:47

    xG 1.24–1.11 (53%)attempts 14–21goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Tucker14:08

    xG 0.26–0.43 (38%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Faulk – Broberg15:53

    xG 0.17–0.80 (18%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.8 xGPIT 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #47 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.49 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 52% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).