Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 6, 2025·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Dallas Stars 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
DAL170141400225
MIN01301021711341

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:51DALJason RobertsonAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Esa Lindell · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P3 3:08MINMatt BoldyAssists: Ryan Hartman, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P3 5:00MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Marco Rossi, Matt Boldy · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:05DALThomas HarleyAssists: Mason Marchment, Matt Duchene · Snap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. OT 0:58MINMarco RossiPPGWGAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Matt Boldy · Tip-in, 0.19 xG2–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:08MINMatt Boldy: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 3:20MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:25DALMason Marchment: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 12:56DALLian Bichsel: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 19:19DALJason Robertson: Interference2 min
  6. P3 10:55MINMarcus Johansson: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 16:33MINBrock Faber: Tripping2 min
  8. OT 0:13DALJason Robertson: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
43% to win57% to win
← DAL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Steel won the faceoff against Rossi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALMIN
25Shots on goal41
2.4Expected goals3.3
48Shot attempts64
36Faceoffs won20
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
17Hits27
10Blocked shots14
18Giveaways15
1Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. Steel – Bäck – Bourque4:05

    xG 0.07–0.08 (45%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Rantanen – Hintz – Robertson9:22

    xG 0.20–0.29 (40%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  3. Rantanen – Robertson – Johnston2:07

    xG 0.02–0.19 (9%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Benn – Dadonov – Johnston10:33

    xG 0.19–0.72 (21%)attempts 6–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Lindell – Lyubushkin4:22

    xG 0.03–0.08 (25%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Ceci – Harley3:29

    xG 0.02–0.17 (10%)attempts 2–4goals 1–1

  3. Dumba – Bichsel9:27

    xG 0.19–0.69 (22%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Boldy – Rossi9:16

    xG 0.84–0.06 (93%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  2. Shore – Trenin – Brazeau5:04

    xG 0.23–0.11 (68%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Zuccarello – Gaudreau9:29

    xG 0.25–0.13 (65%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  4. Nyquist – Hinostroza – Hartman7:12

    xG 0.07–0.21 (24%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Chisholm14:15

    xG 1.62–0.25 (87%)attempts 22–8goals 2–0

  2. Brodin – Faber17:09

    xG 0.40–0.21 (65%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1

  3. Bogosian – Merrill7:21

    xG 0.15–0.11 (58%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.3 xGDAL 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #241 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.19 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).