Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Apr 7, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

Edmonton Oilers 2, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 86% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM11409124247
ANA062718321

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:51EDMAdam HenriqueAssists: Jake Walman, Corey Perry · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:20ANACutter GauthierAssists: Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:10ANACutter GauthierAssists: Drew Helleson, Isac Lundeström · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:33ANAMason McTavishGWGAssists: Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:29EDMJeff SkinnerAssists: Evan Bouchard, Adam Henrique · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 0:41EDMVasily Podkolzin: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 0:54ANAFrank Vatrano: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 15:23ANAFrank Vatrano: Holding2 min
  4. P2 3:31EDMVasily Podkolzin: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 19:57ANARyan Strome: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 19:57ANARyan Strome: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 19:57EDMMattias Janmark: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 19:57ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 19:57EDMKasperi Kapanen: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:57ANADrew Helleson: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 19:57ANARyan Strome: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 2:09EDMAdam Henrique: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 3:15ANADrew Helleson: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 7:11ANAOliver Kylington: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 10:36EDMMax Jones: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 10:36ANADrew Helleson: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← EDM attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMANA
47Shots on goal21
4.7Expected goals2.0
86Shot attempts43
36Faceoffs won28
6Power plays2
12Penalty minutes28
16Hits10
12Blocked shots16
14Giveaways12
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Arvidsson – Podkolzin7:06

    xG 0.34–0.05 (87%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  2. Perry – Henrique – Hyman6:24

    xG 0.27–0.18 (59%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Hyman – Kapanen – Jones2:18

    xG 0.03–0.03 (53%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Brown – Janmark5:38

    xG 0.25–0.28 (47%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNurse – Walman13:10

    xG 0.70–0.38 (65%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Stecher – Emberson10:02

    xG 0.27–0.10 (72%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Kulak – Bouchard14:10

    xG 0.48–0.88 (35%)attempts 19–15goals 0–3

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Gauthier – Carlsson9:16

    xG 0.82–0.05 (94%)attempts 13–4goals 2–0

  2. Strome – Vatrano – Terry8:58

    xG 0.19–0.17 (52%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Lundeström – Leason – Nesterenko5:51

    xG 0.00–0.26 (0%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Zegras – Colangelo – McTavish8:06

    xG 0.16–0.52 (24%)attempts 5–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKylington – Zellweger6:32

    xG 0.18–0.04 (81%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Zellweger – Mintyukov3:11

    xG 0.11–0.07 (60%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Helleson – LaCombe2:26

    xG 0.09–0.12 (43%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.0 xGEDM 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 37/100 · #816 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 86% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).