Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 13, 2025·Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul

Los Angeles Kings 3, Minnesota Wild 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 74% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK08010313030334
MIN3140506011426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:04MINJared SpurgeonPPAssists: Marcus Johansson, Marco Rossi · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:13MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Zeev Buium, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:33MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P3 3:53LAKKevin FialaAssists: Joel Armia, Brandt Clarke · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:22LAKQuinton ByfieldPPAssists: Adrian Kempe, Anze Kopitar · Snap, 0.14 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:14LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Quinton Byfield, Drew Doughty · Snap, 0.16 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  2. 2. LAK Adrian Kempe stopped
  3. 3. MIN Matt Boldy stopped
  4. 4. LAK Trevor Moore stopped
  5. 5. MIN Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  6. 6. LAK Kevin Fiala stopped
  7. 7. MIN Marco Rossi scored
  8. 8. LAK Andrei Kuzmenko stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:16LAKWarren Foegele: Interference2 min
  2. P1 12:14LAKAndrei Kuzmenko: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:00LAKQuinton Byfield: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:18LAKAdrian Kempe: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 1:40MINMarcus Foligno: Holding2 min
  6. P2 9:36LAKAlex Turcotte: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 5:21MINMarcus Johansson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 15:26LAKAdrian Kempe: Hooking2 min
  9. OT 3:35MINMatt Boldy: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Rossi won the faceoff against Byfield
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKMIN
34Shots on goal26
3.8Expected goals2.3
63Shot attempts49
34Faceoffs won36
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
24Hits23
10Blocked shots11
22Giveaways20
6Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestDanault – Foegele – Moore9:57

    xG 0.29–0.19 (60%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  2. Armia – Fiala – Byfield8:47

    xG 0.32–0.23 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  3. Kopitar – Kempe – Kuzmenko10:27

    xG 0.15–0.12 (55%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Turcotte – Laferriere – Malott6:06

    xG 0.25–0.26 (49%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Dumoulin14:36

    xG 0.30–0.10 (74%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Dumoulin – Ceci2:11

    xG 0.36–0.19 (66%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Ceci – Anderson10:25

    xG 0.30–0.30 (50%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Hartman – Trenin8:59

    xG 0.49–0.17 (74%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Johansson – Tarasenko – Eriksson Ek8:22

    xG 0.09–0.14 (40%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Hinostroza – Ohgren – Yurov6:30

    xG 0.20–0.39 (34%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

  4. Kaprizov – Boldy – Rossi10:15

    xG 0.22–0.42 (34%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Middleton13:01

    xG 0.49–0.59 (46%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

  2. Brodin – Faber18:04

    xG 0.35–0.51 (41%)attempts 15–16goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Buium9:47

    xG 0.20–0.43 (32%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.3 xGLAK 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #154 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 74% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).