Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 17, 2025·United Center, Chicago

Vancouver Canucks 3, Chicago Blackhawks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 84% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN01324012031332
CHI21501007010233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:41CHIRyan DonatoPPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Artyom Levshunov · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:14CHITyler BertuzziAssists: Sam Rinzel · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:49VANJake DeBruskPPAssists: Conor Garland, Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:42VANMax SassonAssists: Filip Hronek, Linus Karlsson · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Teuvo Teravainen stopped
  2. 2. VAN Elias Pettersson stopped
  3. 3. CHI Connor Bedard stopped
  4. 4. VAN Conor Garland stopped
  5. 5. CHI Frank Nazar stopped
  6. 6. VAN Jake DeBrusk stopped
  7. 7. CHI Ryan Donato stopped
  8. 8. VAN Brock Boeser scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:23VANKiefer Sherwood: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 1:46CHIFrank Nazar: Holding2 min
  3. P1 9:30VANKiefer Sherwood: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 9:30CHITyler Bertuzzi: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 11:29VANEvander Kane: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 2:45VANTyler Myers: Holding2 min
  7. P2 3:48CHIConnor Bedard: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 6:16CHIRyan Donato: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 5:11CHILukas Reichel: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 14:48CHIColton Dach: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  11. P3 17:56CHIConnor Bedard: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pettersson won the faceoff against Dickinson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCHI
32Shots on goal33
4.7Expected goals2.3
65Shot attempts56
28Faceoffs won39
6Power plays3
8Penalty minutes14
26Hits19
10Blocked shots10
11Giveaways13
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBoeser – DeBrusk – Chytil11:17

    xG 0.58–0.17 (78%)attempts 13–13goals 0–0

  2. Garland – Pettersson – O'Connor2:41

    xG 0.23–0.11 (68%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Bains – Sasson6:04

    xG 0.22–0.12 (65%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Garland – Pettersson7:54

    xG 0.32–0.50 (39%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Mancini2:04

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Hronek – Pettersson9:04

    xG 0.33–0.22 (61%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  3. Hughes – Mancini8:57

    xG 0.43–0.32 (57%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Bertuzzi – Bedard5:47

    xG 0.50–0.11 (82%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Dickinson – Donato – Mikheyev9:44

    xG 0.46–0.10 (82%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  3. Teravainen – Bertuzzi – Nazar6:52

    xG 0.11–0.06 (66%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Burakovsky – Dach – Bedard5:01

    xG 0.14–0.30 (32%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaiser – Rinzel5:57

    xG 0.56–0.13 (81%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Vlasic – Rinzel5:52

    xG 0.34–0.09 (78%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Grzelcyk – Rinzel3:06

    xG 0.22–0.06 (80%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.3 xGVAN 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #405 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.81 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 84% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).