Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 17, 2025·Delta Center, Salt Lake City

San Jose Sharks 3, Utah Mammoth 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Mammoth win this game 81% of the time.

UTA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS072915321
UTA212111311634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:39UTANick SchmaltzPPAssists: Logan Cooley, Clayton Keller · Snap, 0.30 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:31UTANick SchmaltzAssists: Clayton Keller · Snap, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:23SJSTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Will Smith · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:13SJSJeff SkinnerAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Vincent Desharnais · Backhand, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:09UTALiam O'BrienAssists: Brandon Tanev, Ian Cole · Backhand, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:54UTANick SchmaltzGWGAssists: Clayton Keller · Snap, 0.25 xG2–4
  7. P3 3:25UTAMichael CarconeAssists: Lawson Crouse · Snap, 0.13 xG2–5
  8. P3 11:32UTAClayton KellerAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Barrett Hayton · Snap, 0.09 xG2–6
  9. P3 16:51SJSMacklin CelebriniPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.09 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:07SJSNick Leddy: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:07SJSDmitry Orlov: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:33UTAJack McBain: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:26SJSDmitry Orlov: Holding2 min
  5. P2 18:10SJSWill Smith: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 6:54UTALogan Cooley: Holding2 min
  7. P3 6:54UTALogan Cooley: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 6:54SJSMacklin Celebrini: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 6:54SJSVincent Desharnais: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 6:54UTADmitri Simashev: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 15:34UTADylan Guenther: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0UTA
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackUTA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Cooley
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSUTA
21Shots on goal34
1.8Expected goals3.9
38Shot attempts61
24Faceoffs won25
3Power plays4
20Penalty minutes18
25Hits14
12Blocked shots8
18Giveaways17
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Reaves – Goodrow – Gaudette7:12

    xG 0.12–0.17 (41%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  2. Toffoli – Wennberg – Eklund11:46

    xG 0.42–0.57 (42%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  3. Skinner – Kurashev – Celebrini11:25

    xG 0.40–0.56 (42%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  4. Dellandrea – Smith – Graf6:34

    xG 0.15–0.46 (24%)attempts 3–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Leddy – Orlov13:54

    xG 0.33–0.40 (46%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Desharnais – Dickinson8:52

    xG 0.34–0.41 (46%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  3. Leddy – Dickinson2:21

    xG 0.02–0.19 (8%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Utah Mammoth

Forward lines

  1. bestCrouse – Carcone – McBain9:17

    xG 0.63–0.13 (82%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Schmaltz – Keller – Hayton10:34

    xG 0.71–0.26 (74%)attempts 9–5goals 3–0

  3. Peterka – Guenther – Cooley10:22

    xG 0.45–0.13 (77%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  4. O'Brien – Stenlund – Tanev7:33

    xG 0.47–0.35 (57%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Marino2:13

    xG 0.49–0.05 (90%)attempts 7–1goals 2–0

  2. Sergachev – Simashev10:28

    xG 0.39–0.17 (70%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  3. Cole – Maatta7:35

    xG 0.32–0.17 (65%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

UTA 3.9 xGSJS 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

UTASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

UTA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line UTA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #358 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.39 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50UTA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Mammoth win this game 81% of the time.

UTA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (UTA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).