Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 20, 2025·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Seattle Kraken 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 53% of the time.

PHI winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA181906223
PHI21031106527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:16SEAJordan EberleAssists: Cale Fleury, Berkly Catton · Deflected, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:56PHIOwen TippettAssists: Nick Seeler, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:19PHITyson FoersterPPAssists: Bobby Brink, Cam York · Snap, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:59PHITravis KonecnyGWGAssists: Egor Zamula, Matvei Michkov · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:32PHINoah CatesPPAssists: Cam York, Trevor Zegras · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P2 8:33SEAJani NymanPPAssists: Matty Beniers, Chandler Stephenson · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P2 15:40PHIOwen TippettAssists: Sean Couturier, Cam York · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–5
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 4:40SEAAdam Larsson: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 5:04PHICam York: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 11:26SEAJosh Mahura: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 13:50PHINikita Grebenkin: Instigator2 min
  5. P1 13:50SEACale Fleury: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 13:50PHINikita Grebenkin: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 13:50PHINikita Grebenkin: Instigator misconduct10 min
  8. P2 5:13SEAJohn Hayden: Roughing2 min · PPG
  9. P2 7:40PHIJamie Drysdale: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P2 18:39PHITravis Sanheim: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 10:50SEARyan Lindgren: Instigator2 min
  12. P3 10:50SEARyan Lindgren: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 10:50PHITravis Konecny: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 10:50SEARyan Lindgren: Instigator misconduct10 min
  15. P3 10:54PHISean Couturier: Tripping2 min
  16. P3 14:41PHIJett Luchanko: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← SEA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stephenson won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAPHI
23Shots on goal27
2.2Expected goals2.4
47Shot attempts47
27Faceoffs won36
6Power plays4
28Penalty minutes32
23Hits20
11Blocked shots11
16Giveaways19
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Beniers – Catton9:03

    xG 0.52–0.34 (60%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Eberle – Schwartz – Beniers3:16

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Marchment – Winterton – Wright4:50

    xG 0.18–0.21 (46%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  4. Stephenson – Tolvanen – Catton2:52

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindgren – Fleury6:05

    xG 0.47–0.07 (86%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Oleksiak – Fleury2:18

    xG 0.09–0.03 (78%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Lindgren5:36

    xG 0.14–0.23 (37%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Konecny – Tippett10:56

    xG 0.66–0.15 (82%)attempts 16–5goals 2–0

  2. Hathaway – Grebenkin – Luchanko3:22

    xG 0.37–0.16 (70%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Cates – Brink – Foerster8:35

    xG 0.02–0.20 (8%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Dvorak – Zegras – Michkov7:37

    xG 0.07–0.30 (19%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJuulsen – Zamula11:41

    xG 0.62–0.12 (84%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Seeler – Drysdale10:27

    xG 0.55–0.18 (75%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  3. Sanheim – York12:07

    xG 0.44–0.43 (51%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.4 xGSEA 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHISEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #677 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 53% of the time.

PHI winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).