Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 21, 2025·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Anaheim Ducks 5, Nashville Predators 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 80% of the time.

NSH winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA11331217532
NSH11111502228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:52ANARoss JohnstonAssists: Radko Gudas, Pavel Mintyukov · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:29NSHTyson JostAssists: Spencer Stastney, Justin Barron · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:23ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Jacob Trouba, Cutter Gauthier · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:39NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Roman Josi, Ryan O'Reilly · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:07ANACutter GauthierGWGAssists: Jacob Trouba · Snap, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 16:59ANABeckett SenneckeAssists: Mason McTavish, Ross Johnston · Snap, 0.14 xG4–2
  7. P3 11:40ANATroy TerryAssists: Ryan Poehling, Ross Johnston · Wrist, 0.19 xG5–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 16:09NSHRoman Josi: Holding2 min
  2. P2 7:05NSHErik Haula: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 7:42NSHAdam Wilsby: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:42ANACutter Gauthier: Interference2 min
  5. P3 2:55NSHAdam Wilsby: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 13:31ANARoss Johnston: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 13:31NSHMichael McCarron: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 14:26NSHOzzy Wiesblatt: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 14:26ANAFrank Vatrano: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 18:07NSHCole Smith: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against Haula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANANSH
32Shots on goal28
4.0Expected goals2.0
65Shot attempts55
33Faceoffs won28
5Power plays1
12Penalty minutes20
23Hits16
9Blocked shots11
13Giveaways16
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Terry – Nesterenko11:26

    xG 0.43–0.29 (59%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  2. Killorn – Gauthier – Carlsson8:24

    xG 0.41–0.45 (48%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

  3. Johnston – Poehling – Colangelo7:15

    xG 0.07–0.27 (21%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  4. Vatrano – McTavish – Sennecke8:53

    xG 0.07–0.57 (11%)attempts 3–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – Zellweger14:18

    xG 0.62–0.29 (68%)attempts 14–13goals 3–0

  2. Helleson – LaCombe14:58

    xG 0.59–0.56 (51%)attempts 15–15goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – Mintyukov12:37

    xG 0.49–0.63 (44%)attempts 11–14goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestMcCarron – Smith – Wiesblatt7:50

    xG 0.73–0.34 (68%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  2. Jost – Svechkov – Martin5:49

    xG 0.21–0.11 (67%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

  3. O'Reilly – Forsberg – Evangelista7:44

    xG 0.35–0.42 (46%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  4. Forsberg – Jost – Svechkov2:04

    xG 0.09–0.21 (29%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStastney – Barron11:22

    xG 0.74–0.38 (66%)attempts 19–11goals 1–1

  2. Josi – Wilsby15:50

    xG 0.76–0.68 (53%)attempts 17–10goals 1–1

  3. Skjei – Perbix13:49

    xG 0.33–0.42 (44%)attempts 10–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.0 xGANA 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #639 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.34 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 80% of the time.

NSH winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).