Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 25, 2025·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Los Angeles Kings 4, Nashville Predators 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 63% of the time.

NSH winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK113214112013440
NSH1122412074525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:27LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Brandt Clarke, Andrei Kuzmenko · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:00NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Spencer Stastney · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:36NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Matthew Wood, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:35LAKJoel ArmiaAssists: Alex Turcotte · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:24LAKCorey PerryAssists: Joel Armia · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–2
  6. P2 7:12NSHCole SmithUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P3 9:50LAKTrevor MooreAssists: Brandt Clarke, Joel Edmundson · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:44NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Filip Forsberg, Nicolas Hague · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Ryan O'Reilly scored
  2. 2. LAK Adrian Kempe scored
  3. 3. NSH Filip Forsberg scored
  4. 4. LAK Corey Perry stopped
  5. 5. NSH Steven Stamkos stopped
  6. 6. LAK Trevor Moore scored
  7. 7. NSH Jonathan Marchessault stopped
  8. 8. LAK Quinton Byfield stopped
  9. 9. NSH Matthew Wood stopped
  10. 10. LAK Andrei Kuzmenko stopped
  11. 11. NSH Luke Evangelista stopped
  12. 12. LAK Phillip Danault stopped
  13. 13. NSH Erik Haula scored
  14. 14. LAK Kevin Fiala scored
  15. 15. NSH Michael Bunting stopped
  16. 16. LAK Warren Foegele stopped
  17. 17. NSH Ozzy Wiesblatt scored
  18. 18. LAK Joel Armia stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 16:44LAKMikey Anderson: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 11:35NSHJustin Barron: Slashing2 min
  3. P3 16:29NSHJonathan Marchessault: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 18:37NSHCole Smith: Slashing2 min
  5. OT 2:52LAKTrevor Moore: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Haula won the faceoff against Danault
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKNSH
40Shots on goal25
3.6Expected goals2.8
77Shot attempts40
31Faceoffs won38
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
10Hits23
7Blocked shots19
22Giveaways15
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKopitar – Kempe – Kuzmenko12:22

    xG 1.04–0.46 (69%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  2. Danault – Foegele – Moore11:46

    xG 0.49–0.22 (69%)attempts 20–5goals 1–0

  3. Fiala – Byfield – Laferriere10:26

    xG 0.43–0.34 (56%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  4. Perry – Armia – Byfield2:02

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Clarke12:29

    xG 0.60–0.00 (100%)attempts 18–2goals 3–0

  2. Ceci – Anderson17:40

    xG 1.04–0.46 (70%)attempts 25–8goals 0–1

  3. Doughty – Dumoulin16:22

    xG 1.04–0.99 (51%)attempts 19–13goals 1–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestMcCarron – Smith – Wiesblatt10:08

    xG 0.58–0.44 (57%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

  2. O'Reilly – Forsberg – Wood10:08

    xG 0.45–0.47 (49%)attempts 7–11goals 3–0

  3. Stamkos – Evangelista – Svechkov6:10

    xG 0.01–0.29 (2%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

  4. Stamkos – Haula – Marchessault5:20

    xG 0.18–0.51 (26%)attempts 1–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Stastney – Barron16:10

    xG 0.52–0.79 (40%)attempts 6–22goals 1–0

  2. Hague – Wilsby17:57

    xG 0.80–1.14 (41%)attempts 12–25goals 1–3

  3. Skjei – Perbix14:45

    xG 0.35–0.92 (28%)attempts 9–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.8 xGLAK 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #77 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.71 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 63% of the time.

NSH winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).