Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 28, 2025·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Anaheim Ducks 3, Florida Panthers 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 73% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA062703012317
FLA01201026051233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 9:59ANALeo CarlssonSHAssists: Troy Terry, Drew Helleson · Snap, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P2 12:27ANACutter GauthierPPAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P3 11:12FLAAnton LundellAssists: Mackie Samoskevich, Eetu Luostarinen · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P3 16:54FLASam ReinhartAssists: Seth Jones, Carter Verhaeghe · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Leo Carlsson stopped
  2. 2. FLA Sam Reinhart stopped
  3. 3. ANA Troy Terry scored
  4. 4. FLA Anton Lundell scored
  5. 5. ANA Mason McTavish scored
  6. 6. FLA Evan Rodrigues stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:28FLAJesper Boqvist: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:52FLAEvan Rodrigues: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 0:38ANAOlen Zellweger: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 3:43ANABeckett Sennecke: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 9:13ANAIan Moore: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 10:34FLACarter Verhaeghe: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P2 11:00FLANiko Mikkola: Interference2 min
  8. P2 19:00ANARoss Johnston: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 19:00FLAA.J. Greer: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 13:24FLASam Bennett: Cross checking2 min
  11. OT 2:54ANAMason McTavish: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundell won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAFLA
17Shots on goal33
2.4Expected goals3.9
54Shot attempts74
18Faceoffs won28
5Power plays4
13Penalty minutes15
19Hits30
17Blocked shots22
16Giveaways16
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestTerry – Nesterenko – Carlsson9:49

    xG 0.34–0.15 (69%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  2. Johnston – Poehling – Colangelo2:13

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Vatrano – Harkins – Colangelo4:25

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–7goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Vatrano – Poehling2:05

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLaCombe – Moore2:00

    xG 0.21–0.07 (75%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Trouba – LaCombe3:09

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Moore – Mintyukov9:07

    xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Reinhart – Rodrigues12:19

    xG 0.87–0.49 (64%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  2. Luostarinen – Lundell – Samoskevich8:32

    xG 0.37–0.19 (66%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Bennett – Greer – Boqvist6:54

    xG 0.12–0.04 (77%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Kunin – Gregor – Schwindt3:33

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Balinskis8:24

    xG 0.34–0.02 (94%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  2. Ekblad – Forsling15:06

    xG 0.44–0.16 (73%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  3. Jones – Mikkola11:48

    xG 0.66–0.66 (50%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.9 xGANA 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #392 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.86 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 73% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).