Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 28, 2025·United Center, Chicago

Ottawa Senators 3, Chicago Blackhawks 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 51% of the time.

CHI winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT073908324
CHI3815313726

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:47CHIColton DachAssists: Louis Crevier, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:06CHILouis CrevierAssists: Jason Dickinson, Alex Vlasic · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:53CHIConnor BedardPPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Frank Nazar · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:58CHIConnor BedardGWGAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Artyom Levshunov · Snap, 0.11 xG0–4
  5. P2 4:58OTTJake SandersonAssists: Drake Batherson, Tim Stützle · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–4
  6. P2 7:09OTTMichael AmadioAssists: Artem Zub · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P2 8:31OTTTim StützleAssists: Nikolas Matinpalo, Drake Batherson · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–4
  8. P3 3:46CHIConnor BedardAssists: Ryan Greene · Snap, 0.06 xG3–5
  9. P3 8:24CHIRyan DonatoAssists: Connor Bedard, Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–6
  10. P3 12:44CHIFrank NazarENAssists: Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.79 xG3–7
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:52CHISam Rinzel: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 17:37OTTDavid Perron: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:24CHISam Rinzel: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 8:31CHISam Lafferty: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  5. P3 11:36CHITyler Bertuzzi: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 11:36OTTNick Cousins: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 11:36CHITyler Bertuzzi: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 11:36OTTTim Stützle: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 11:36CHISam Rinzel: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 11:36OTTNick Cousins: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 11:36CHITyler Bertuzzi: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← OTT attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nazar won the faceoff against Pinto
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTCHI
24Shots on goal26
2.3Expected goals2.3
59Shot attempts55
36Faceoffs won28
4Power plays1
16Penalty minutes22
32Hits34
17Blocked shots15
9Giveaways14
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Amadio – Pinto10:01

    xG 0.42–0.04 (91%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  2. Cousins – Batherson – Stützle8:46

    xG 0.25–0.05 (85%)attempts 13–3goals 2–0

  3. Eller – Zetterlund – Lycksell7:38

    xG 0.34–0.28 (55%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

  4. Perron – Cozens – Greig9:16

    xG 0.38–0.36 (51%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJensen – Chabot15:17

    xG 0.97–0.32 (75%)attempts 24–13goals 0–0

  2. Kleven – Matinpalo12:33

    xG 0.23–0.23 (50%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

  3. Chabot – Sanderson2:10

    xG 0.00–0.06 (1%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestTeravainen – Bertuzzi – Nazar9:23

    xG 0.43–0.11 (79%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Lafferty – Dach3:54

    xG 0.20–0.07 (73%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Burakovsky – Greene – Bedard11:06

    xG 0.31–0.49 (39%)attempts 9–8goals 2–1

  4. Dickinson – Donato – Dach9:26

    xG 0.07–0.31 (19%)attempts 3–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – Crevier2:27

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Murphy – Kaiser2:22

    xG 0.22–0.06 (79%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Grzelcyk – Levshunov6:41

    xG 0.13–0.10 (57%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.3 xGOTT 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #191 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 51% of the time.

CHI winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).