Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 28, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Montréal Canadiens 4, Seattle Kraken 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

SEA winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MTL27051712421
SEA050531100321

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:25MTLCole CaufieldAssists: Nick Suzuki, Noah Dobson · Snap, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:28MTLJuraj SlafkovskýPPAssists: Cole Caufield, Nick Suzuki · Snap, 0.24 xG2–0
  3. P3 5:55MTLAlex NewhookPPAssists: Kirby Dach, Noah Dobson · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–0
  4. P3 8:57SEABrandon MontourPPAssists: Berkly Catton, Mason Marchment · Slap, 0.03 xG3–1
  5. P3 15:17SEAShane WrightAssists: Brandon Montour, Eeli Tolvanen · Snap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:17SEABrandon MontourAssists: Vince Dunn, Jaden Schwartz · Slap, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:44MTLCole CaufieldGWGAssists: Nick Suzuki, Lane Hutson · Poke, 0.07 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:45MTLCole Caufield: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:17SEARyan Lindgren: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:58MTLJoseph Veleno: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 13:59MTLZachary Bolduc: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 4:09SEAJaden Schwartz: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 7:57MTLJayden Struble: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 13:20SEAJani Nyman: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 13:20MTLKirby Dach: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
47% to win53% to win
← MTL attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Suzuki won the faceoff against Stephenson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLSEA
21Shots on goal21
1.7Expected goals1.7
42Shot attempts48
30Faceoffs won19
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
18Hits22
15Blocked shots9
15Giveaways15
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestSuzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský12:21

    xG 0.62–0.14 (82%)attempts 16–4goals 1–0

  2. Veleno – Dach – Bolduc10:30

    xG 0.21–0.00 (98%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Gallagher – Anderson – Evans7:53

    xG 0.25–0.20 (55%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  4. Newhook – Kapanen – Demidov5:25

    xG 0.05–0.14 (26%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarrier – Xhekaj7:53

    xG 0.32–0.09 (77%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  2. Struble – Hutson13:42

    xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  3. Dobson – Hutson2:17

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestKartye – Nyman – Meyers2:29

    xG 0.08–0.01 (94%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Schwartz – Nyman – Wright3:46

    xG 0.06–0.01 (86%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Schwartz – Stephenson – Winterton5:43

    xG 0.06–0.05 (56%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Marchment – Tolvanen – Wright6:31

    xG 0.00–0.04 (11%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Montour – Lindgren13:02

    xG 0.35–0.32 (52%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  2. Montour – Mahura2:41

    xG 0.08–0.13 (39%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Dunn3:09

    xG 0.00–0.05 (8%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 1.7 xGMTL 1.7 xG
00.511.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #188 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.79 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

SEA winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).