Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 30, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Vancouver Canucks 4, St. Louis Blues 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 76% of the time.

STL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN191415001418
STL110111116020339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:23STLDylan HollowayAssists: Oskar Sundqvist, Pius Suter · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:08VANKiefer SherwoodPPAssists: Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:58STLJimmy SnuggerudPPAssists: Cam Fowler, Jordan Binnington · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:42VANKiefer SherwoodAssists: Drew O'Connor, Marcus Pettersson · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:04VANKiefer SherwoodAssists: Aatu Räty, Drew O'Connor · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:48STLPius SuterPPAssists: Cam Fowler, Oskar Sundqvist · Snap, 0.12 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Jordan Kyrou stopped
  2. 2. VAN Kiefer Sherwood stopped
  3. 3. STL Jimmy Snuggerud stopped
  4. 4. VAN Elias Pettersson stopped
  5. 5. VAN Jake DeBrusk scored
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:32STLLogan Mailloux: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 11:57STLLogan Mailloux: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:03VANMarcus Pettersson: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:01STLColton Parayko: Throwing equipment2 min
  5. P2 18:58VANKevin Lankinen: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 8:53VANMarcus Pettersson: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pettersson won the faceoff against Suter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSTL
18Shots on goal39
2.0Expected goals3.6
50Shot attempts72
27Faceoffs won25
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
21Hits17
16Blocked shots14
14Giveaways11
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Pettersson – Sherwood2:05

    xG 0.29–0.11 (73%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Kane – MacEachern – Reichel2:42

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Kane – DeBrusk – Pettersson2:08

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Pettersson – Sherwood – O'Connor2:35

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Joseph12:40

    xG 0.40–0.16 (71%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

  2. Myers – Pettersson3:10

    xG 0.20–0.27 (43%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Hronek – Pettersson10:38

    xG 0.24–0.39 (37%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestJoseph – Kyrou – Dvorsky6:43

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Schenn – Buchnevich – Kyrou3:31

    xG 0.21–0.14 (61%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  3. Bjugstad – Walker – Toropchenko4:37

    xG 0.37–0.35 (51%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  4. Sundqvist – Suter – Holloway8:29

    xG 0.16–0.20 (45%)attempts 6–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTucker – Mailloux8:51

    xG 0.47–0.15 (76%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  2. Faulk – Fowler16:25

    xG 0.72–0.53 (57%)attempts 15–14goals 1–1

  3. Parayko – Broberg17:54

    xG 0.73–0.57 (56%)attempts 17–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.6 xGVAN 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #305 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 76% of the time.

STL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).