Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 30, 2025·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

New Jersey Devils 2, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 62% of the time.

SJS winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD1901319231
SJS31521300528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:42SJSWilliam EklundAssists: Philipp Kurashev · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:12SJSPhilipp KurashevAssists: Alexander Wennberg · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:47SJSAlexander WennbergGWGAssists: Mario Ferraro, Timothy Liljegren · Tip-in, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:00NJDDawson MercerPPAssists: Jack Hughes, Dougie Hamilton · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:50SJSWill SmithAssists: Macklin Celebrini · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:30SJSTyler ToffoliAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Timothy Liljegren · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P3 4:19NJDDawson MercerPPAssists: Dougie Hamilton, Jesper Bratt · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 7:26NJDPaul Cotter: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 8:52SJSWill Smith: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 12:31NJDJonas Siegenthaler: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:47SJSDmitry Orlov: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 3:31SJSWilliam Eklund: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← NJD attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Hischier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDSJS
31Shots on goal28
2.0Expected goals2.5
65Shot attempts50
31Faceoffs won27
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
30Hits16
11Blocked shots27
16Giveaways17
6Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestPalat – Bratt – Hughes9:20

    xG 0.55–0.33 (63%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  2. Noesen – Glendening – Cotter8:39

    xG 0.15–0.22 (41%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  3. Brown – Lammikko – Gritsyuk10:02

    xG 0.32–0.50 (39%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  4. Meier – Hischier – Mercer11:53

    xG 0.15–0.54 (22%)attempts 13–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – Nemec13:35

    xG 0.75–0.43 (64%)attempts 23–8goals 0–3

  2. Hamilton – Siegenthaler15:40

    xG 0.75–0.54 (58%)attempts 21–7goals 0–2

  3. Hughes – Casey16:51

    xG 0.14–0.54 (21%)attempts 13–16goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Smith – Celebrini14:05

    xG 0.48–0.40 (54%)attempts 13–16goals 2–0

  2. Reaves – Goodrow – Giles5:23

    xG 0.24–0.16 (60%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  3. Skinner – Dellandrea – Graf8:53

    xG 0.28–0.21 (57%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Wennberg – Kurashev – Eklund13:22

    xG 0.47–0.61 (44%)attempts 11–16goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Liljegren17:31

    xG 0.60–0.43 (58%)attempts 17–15goals 1–0

  2. Mukhamadullin – Dickinson12:22

    xG 0.58–0.62 (48%)attempts 10–17goals 1–0

  3. Klingberg – Ferraro15:22

    xG 0.30–0.39 (44%)attempts 6–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.5 xGNJD 2.0 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #829 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 62% of the time.

SJS winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).