Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 1, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Edmonton Oilers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 61% of the time.

EDM winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI0611111101229
EDM0132100413330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:54EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:32CHITyler BertuzziPPAssists: Connor Bedard, Andre Burakovsky · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:17EDMJack RoslovicPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Evan Bouchard · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P3 3:19CHIAndre BurakovskyAssists: Artyom Levshunov, Ryan Greene · Snap, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. OT 2:43EDMEvan BouchardGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.18 xG2–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 10:57CHIConnor Bedard: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  2. P1 19:05CHIWyatt Kaiser: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:24EDMNoah Philp: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 16:16CHIColton Dach: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 0:42CHIConnor Bedard: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← CHI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Dach
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIEDM
29Shots on goal30
2.8Expected goals3.5
57Shot attempts64
20Faceoffs won25
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
9Hits18
17Blocked shots14
17Giveaways14
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Greene – Bedard12:08

    xG 1.20–0.42 (74%)attempts 20–14goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Slaggert – Dach4:44

    xG 0.18–0.14 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Teravainen – Bertuzzi – Nazar12:59

    xG 0.50–0.49 (50%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  4. Donato – Mikheyev – Bedard2:10

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaiser – Levshunov6:07

    xG 0.55–0.11 (84%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  2. Murphy – Grzelcyk4:34

    xG 0.46–0.09 (83%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Grzelcyk – Levshunov5:18

    xG 0.35–0.02 (94%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestDraisaitl – Roslovic – Podkolzin13:27

    xG 0.56–0.27 (67%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  2. Nugent-Hopkins – Mangiapane – McDavid13:03

    xG 0.52–0.53 (49%)attempts 14–18goals 0–0

  3. Lazar – Philp – Howard6:32

    xG 0.12–0.14 (46%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Frederic – Savoie7:49

    xG 0.26–0.75 (26%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard16:35

    xG 1.04–0.53 (66%)attempts 19–17goals 0–0

  2. Kulak – Emberson12:27

    xG 0.58–0.67 (46%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  3. Nurse – Walman19:53

    xG 0.35–0.89 (28%)attempts 15–21goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.5 xGCHI 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #584 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.81 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 61% of the time.

EDM winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).