Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 7, 2025·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Calgary Flames 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 58% of the time.

CGY winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11007310427
CGY011011011033

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:32CHITyler BertuzziPPGWGAssists: Connor Bedard, Artyom Levshunov · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P3 1:11CHITyler BertuzziAssists: Connor Bedard, Andre Burakovsky · Snap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P3 7:56CHIAndre BurakovskyAssists: Connor Bedard · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P3 18:01CHIConnor BedardUnassisted · Wrist, 0.32 xG4–0
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 11:22CGYRasmus Andersson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:19CHIColton Dach: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 16:19CGYJoel Farabee: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:46CHITeuvo Teravainen: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 1:12CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 1:12CHIAlex Vlasic: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 2:19CGYJoel Hanley: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 2:19CHINick Foligno: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 2:19CGYJoel Hanley: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 12:49CHILouis Crevier: Holding2 min
  11. P3 13:19CGYBlake Coleman: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 14:58CHINick Foligno: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← CHI attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Frost won the faceoff against Nazar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICGY
27Shots on goal33
1.9Expected goals2.3
47Shot attempts56
25Faceoffs won35
3Power plays3
21Penalty minutes21
18Hits29
10Blocked shots13
17Giveaways15
10Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Bertuzzi – Bedard6:46

    xG 0.85–0.37 (70%)attempts 8–8goals 3–0

  2. Burakovsky – Greene – Bedard2:10

    xG 0.08–0.01 (88%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Dach – Moore2:42

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Burakovsky – Bedard – Moore2:17

    xG 0.03–0.03 (48%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Grzelcyk2:52

    xG 0.45–0.01 (98%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Grzelcyk – Rinzel5:24

    xG 0.55–0.13 (82%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  3. Crevier – Kaiser2:19

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Honzek8:06

    xG 0.45–0.15 (76%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  2. Huberdeau – Frost – Coronato11:28

    xG 0.81–0.55 (60%)attempts 19–10goals 0–1

  3. Kadri – Farabee – Sharangovich5:44

    xG 0.34–0.13 (72%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

  4. Lomberg – Zary – Klapka3:04

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Kuznetsov3:29

    xG 0.43–0.02 (96%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Hanley – Andersson2:57

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Andersson – Pachal2:40

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.3 xGCHI 1.9 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 8/100 · #1250 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 58% of the time.

CGY winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).