Sat, Nov 8, 2025·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia
Ottawa Senators 3, Philadelphia Flyers 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 58% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTT | 26 | 06 | 01 | 11 | 314 |
| PHI | 04 | 110 | 18 | 00 | 222 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 5:14OTTTim StützleAssists: David Perron, Ridly Greig · Slap, 0.12 xG1–0
- P1 6:19OTTMichael AmadioAssists: Claude Giroux, Shane Pinto · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–0
- P2 11:23PHIMatvei MichkovAssists: Christian Dvorak, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.14 xG2–1
- P3 9:55PHIJamie DrysdaleAssists: Christian Dvorak, Trevor Zegras · Snap, 0.15 xG2–2
- OT 3:19OTTTim StützleGWGAssists: Drake Batherson, Thomas Chabot · Snap, 0.23 xG3–2
Penalties (8)
- P1 12:07OTTArtem Zub: Slashing2 min
- P1 14:42PHIEmil Andrae: Interference2 min
- P2 6:41OTTNick Cousins: Slashing2 min
- P2 9:03OTTRidly Greig: Interference2 min
- P2 9:03PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
- P2 14:14OTTDylan Cozens: Boarding2 min
- P2 14:14PHINoah Juulsen: Roughing2 min
- P3 2:07PHIMatvei Michkov: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Stützle won the faceoff against Dvorak
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestZetterlund – Batherson – Cozens8:57
xG 0.72–0.14 (84%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0
- Giroux – Amadio – Pinto8:49
xG 0.49–0.06 (89%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0
- Perron – Greig – Stützle7:37
xG 0.24–0.19 (56%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0
- Eller – Cousins – Lycksell6:24
xG 0.01–0.11 (10%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSanderson – Zub13:50
xG 0.75–0.05 (94%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0
- Jensen – Chabot14:08
xG 0.51–0.46 (53%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0
- Spence – Kleven13:41
xG 0.38–0.40 (48%)attempts 7–15goals 1–0
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestHathaway – Abols – Grebenkin7:15
xG 0.21–0.01 (97%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0
- Couturier – Brink – Michkov7:43
xG 0.27–0.13 (67%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1
- Dvorak – Tippett – Zegras10:14
xG 0.23–0.48 (32%)attempts 8–6goals 1–1
- Konecny – Grundstrom – Cates8:25
xG 0.18–0.71 (20%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Seeler – Drysdale12:57
xG 0.50–0.45 (53%)attempts 20–8goals 1–2
- Juulsen – Andrae10:55
xG 0.35–0.34 (51%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Sanheim – York15:09
xG 0.43–0.80 (35%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 58% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHI − OTT), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).