Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 15, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

San Jose Sharks 1, Seattle Kraken 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 54% of the time.

SEA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1701405126
SEA1621017423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:14SEAJaden SchwartzAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Jamie Oleksiak · Deflected, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:42SJSAlexander WennbergPPAssists: Macklin Celebrini, William Eklund · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:05SEAAdam LarssonGWGAssists: Mason Marchment, Matty Beniers · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:43SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Jamie Oleksiak · Slap, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:31SEAJaden SchwartzENAssists: Ryan Lindgren, Chandler Stephenson · Wrist, 0.33 xG1–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 19:10SEARyan Lindgren: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 3:52SJSBarclay Goodrow: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 5:00SEAEeli Tolvanen: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 11:17SEAVince Dunn: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 1:07SEATye Kartye: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 5:29SJSVincent Desharnais: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 7:23SEAJordan Eberle: Holding2 min
  8. P3 14:42SEAFrederick Gaudreau: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dellandrea won the faceoff against Catton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSSEA
26Shots on goal23
2.6Expected goals2.4
74Shot attempts43
29Faceoffs won24
6Power plays2
4Penalty minutes12
19Hits13
8Blocked shots25
14Giveaways12
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Gaudette – Dellandrea10:05

    xG 0.60–0.23 (73%)attempts 18–5goals 0–1

  2. Kurashev – Smith – Celebrini10:35

    xG 0.86–0.65 (57%)attempts 18–10goals 0–2

  3. Wennberg – Eklund – Graf10:31

    xG 0.27–0.17 (61%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  4. Reaves – Goodrow – Ostapchuk7:31

    xG 0.02–0.32 (6%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Mukhamadullin15:36

    xG 0.72–0.31 (70%)attempts 21–14goals 0–0

  2. Orlov – Klingberg11:22

    xG 0.70–0.57 (55%)attempts 22–8goals 0–1

  3. Leddy – Desharnais10:17

    xG 0.18–0.27 (41%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Stephenson – Tolvanen3:29

    xG 0.39–0.18 (68%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  2. Eberle – Marchment – Beniers12:13

    xG 0.47–0.35 (58%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  3. Tolvanen – Wright – Catton4:27

    xG 0.13–0.11 (54%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Kartye – Winterton3:26

    xG 0.03–0.04 (44%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Montour – Lindgren12:58

    xG 0.57–0.53 (52%)attempts 15–17goals 0–0

  2. Oleksiak – Montour2:14

    xG 0.05–0.02 (68%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Evans11:39

    xG 0.52–0.57 (47%)attempts 7–15goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.4 xGSJS 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 33/100 · #928 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 54% of the time.

SEA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).