Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 26, 2025·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Nashville Predators 6, Detroit Red Wings 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 65% of the time.

DET winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH1120859629
DET07210114331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:48NSHMichael BuntingPPAssists: Nick Blankenburg, Erik Haula · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:30DETAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Dylan Larkin, Lucas Raymond · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:34DETJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Nate Danielson · Snap, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:05NSHNick BlankenburgAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Backhand, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:20NSHRoman JosiAssists: Michael Bunting, Michael McCarron · Snap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:04DETBen ChiarotAssists: Mason Appleton, J.T. Compher · Wrist, 0.00 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:14NSHRyan O'ReillyGWGAssists: Luke Evangelista, Steven Stamkos · Snap, 0.23 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:42NSHErik HaulaAssists: Filip Forsberg, Jonathan Marchessault · Snap, 0.25 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:45NSHSteven StamkosENAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Luke Evangelista · Snap, 0.69 xG6–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 15:09DETNate Danielson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 17:34DETAlex DeBrincat: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 18:52NSHRoman Josi: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 4:34NSHRoman Josi: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:45DETMoritz Seider: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 13:35NSHSteven Stamkos: Holding2 min
  7. P2 15:03NSHNick Blankenburg: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 17:11DETBen Chiarot: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P2 0:00DETBen Chiarot: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 0:00NSHOzzy Wiesblatt: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Larkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHDET
29Shots on goal31
3.6Expected goals2.7
64Shot attempts55
34Faceoffs won37
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
22Hits13
8Blocked shots17
7Giveaways14
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – O'Reilly – Evangelista9:40

    xG 0.64–0.27 (70%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  2. McCarron – Bunting – Wiesblatt5:24

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  3. Haula – Marchessault – Forsberg9:18

    xG 0.56–0.37 (60%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  4. Forsberg – Svechkov – Wood5:00

    xG 0.24–0.06 (79%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSkjei – Perbix11:45

    xG 1.10–0.39 (74%)attempts 18–14goals 1–1

  2. Stastney – Blankenburg7:34

    xG 0.39–0.05 (90%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  3. Josi – Hague10:41

    xG 0.64–0.49 (57%)attempts 13–10goals 2–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. Compher – Appleton – Soderblom9:09

    xG 0.10–0.06 (61%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  2. Kane – DeBrincat – Kasper10:25

    xG 0.65–0.77 (46%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  3. Larkin – Raymond – Finnie12:03

    xG 0.35–0.70 (33%)attempts 13–19goals 0–1

  4. van Riemsdyk – Copp – Danielson7:03

    xG 0.03–0.45 (5%)attempts 3–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Gustafsson – Sandin-Pellikka13:21

    xG 0.35–0.42 (46%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

  2. Hamonic – Johansson9:14

    xG 0.47–0.59 (44%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

  3. Chiarot – Seider15:21

    xG 0.27–0.59 (32%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 2.7 xGNSH 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #143 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.18 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 65% of the time.

DET winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).