Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 26, 2025·Ball Arena, Denver

San Jose Sharks 0, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 81% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS0501704026
COL215311116642

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:39COLRoss ColtonGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:07COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Cale Makar, Gabriel Landeskog · Slap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:44COLSam MalinskiAssists: Artturi Lehkonen, Martin Necas · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:51COLJosh MansonAssists: Victor Olofsson, Parker Kelly · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:00COLJoel KivirantaAssists: Ivan Ivan, Zakhar Bardakov · Snap, 0.18 xG0–5
  6. P3 16:15COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Martin Necas · Snap, 0.23 xG0–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 12:30SJSAdam Gaudette: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 17:45SJSWilliam Eklund: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:18COLDevon Toews: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:05SJSTy Dellandrea: Holding2 min
  5. P2 13:20COLGabriel Landeskog: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 16:04COLJoel Kiviranta: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 7:18COLBrock Nelson: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 10:35SJSVincent Desharnais: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Celebrini
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
26Shots on goal42
2.3Expected goals4.4
62Shot attempts84
27Faceoffs won29
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
22Hits10
18Blocked shots22
13Giveaways12
5Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Wennberg – Kurashev6:33

    xG 0.52–0.34 (61%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  2. Gaudette – Dellandrea – Graf9:31

    xG 0.37–0.55 (40%)attempts 4–15goals 0–1

  3. Reaves – Goodrow – Ostapchuk6:18

    xG 0.02–0.45 (3%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  4. Eklund – Smith – Celebrini11:37

    xG 0.43–1.38 (24%)attempts 10–19goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Orlov – Dickinson3:09

    xG 0.16–0.26 (39%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Desharnais – Dickinson11:42

    xG 0.46–0.73 (38%)attempts 9–16goals 0–2

  3. Orlov – Liljegren12:22

    xG 0.28–0.98 (22%)attempts 9–18goals 0–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas10:51

    xG 1.22–0.33 (79%)attempts 22–11goals 2–0

  2. Olofsson – Kelly – Drury7:25

    xG 0.84–0.41 (67%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  3. Kiviranta – Bardakov – Ivan7:18

    xG 0.26–0.11 (69%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  4. Nelson – Landeskog – Colton8:06

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar11:46

    xG 1.57–0.55 (74%)attempts 21–18goals 1–0

  2. Burns – Manson10:01

    xG 0.53–0.06 (90%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  3. Toews – Malinski2:37

    xG 0.38–0.21 (64%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.4 xGSJS 2.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1290 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 81% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).