Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 9, 2025·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Colorado Avalanche 3, Nashville Predators 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 51% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL213013112040342
NSH2110619051431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:12COLBrock NelsonAssists: Josh Manson, Brent Burns · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:05NSHJonathan MarchessaultPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Filip Forsberg · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:30NSHReid SchaeferAssists: Fedor Svechkov · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P1 10:21COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Martin Necas, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 12:58NSHBrady SkjeiAssists: Adam Wilsby, Luke Evangelista · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:52COLCale MakarPPAssists: Martin Necas, Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.04 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Ryan O'Reilly scored
  2. 2. COL Martin Necas stopped
  3. 3. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  4. 4. COL Valeri Nichushkin stopped
  5. 5. NSH Steven Stamkos stopped
  6. 6. COL Gabriel Landeskog stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:01COLJoel Kiviranta: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:20COLCale Makar: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 15:05NSHSpencer Stastney: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 17:01NSHNicolas Hague: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 19:37NSHFedor Svechkov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 18:22NSHErik Haula: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNSH
42Shots on goal31
3.7Expected goals3.6
79Shot attempts50
32Faceoffs won32
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
9Hits11
7Blocked shots18
16Giveaways14
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestNelson – Landeskog – Colton8:07

    xG 0.70–0.23 (75%)attempts 13–5goals 1–1

  2. Nichushkin – Olofsson – Drury5:47

    xG 0.24–0.14 (64%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Kelly – Drury – Kiviranta2:57

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Kelly – Kiviranta – Bardakov2:44

    xG 0.08–0.05 (62%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Manson10:24

    xG 0.42–0.10 (81%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Burns – Toews2:05

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Toews – Makar15:21

    xG 0.57–0.73 (44%)attempts 17–10goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – O'Reilly – Evangelista8:06

    xG 0.89–0.10 (90%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  2. Forsberg – Evangelista – Svechkov2:21

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Forsberg – Svechkov – Wood2:12

    xG 0.10–0.06 (63%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. McCarron – Bunting – Schaefer3:37

    xG 0.00–0.05 (4%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSkjei – Wilsby11:56

    xG 1.05–0.48 (69%)attempts 16–17goals 1–1

  2. Stastney – Blankenburg7:07

    xG 0.70–0.25 (73%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Skjei – Perbix2:53

    xG 0.36–0.03 (92%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.6 xGCOL 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #177 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.41 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +51 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 51% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).