Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 11, 2025·UBS Arena, Elmont

Anaheim Ducks 2, New York Islanders 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Islanders win this game 63% of the time.

NYI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA012110111233
NYI31301529537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:18NYITravis MitchellAssists: Simon Holmstrom, Scott Mayfield · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:16NYIAnders LeePPAssists: Tony DeAngelo, Simon Holmstrom · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:06NYIAnders LeePPGWGAssists: Tony DeAngelo, Mathew Barzal · Backhand, 0.15 xG0–3
  4. P2 5:34ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Troy Terry, Olen Zellweger · Snap, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P3 2:37ANATroy TerrySHAssists: Ryan Poehling, Jackson LaCombe · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:06NYISimon HolmstromAssists: Anders Lee, Adam Pelech · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 14:46NYIRyan PulockAssists: Jean-Gabriel Pageau, Anders Lee · Snap, 0.01 xG2–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:33ANARyan Strome: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 17:23ANABeckett Sennecke: Boarding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 4:46ANAJackson LaCombe: Holding2 min
  4. P2 5:25NYIAnthony Duclair: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 1:48ANAChris Kreider: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYI
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackNYI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carlsson won the faceoff against Barzal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANANYI
33Shots on goal37
3.2Expected goals4.0
78Shot attempts68
32Faceoffs won38
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
15Hits20
13Blocked shots18
14Giveaways19
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Terry – Carlsson3:37

    xG 0.17–0.04 (80%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Kreider – Strome – Vatrano2:19

    xG 0.08–0.05 (60%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. McTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke11:37

    xG 0.37–0.36 (50%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  4. Kreider – Terry – Carlsson10:43

    xG 0.63–0.64 (49%)attempts 17–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – LaCombe18:56

    xG 0.98–0.84 (54%)attempts 31–16goals 0–0

  2. Helleson – Zellweger2:49

    xG 0.12–0.09 (57%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – Zellweger10:02

    xG 0.25–0.48 (35%)attempts 11–15goals 0–2

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. bestDuclair – Holmstrom – Ritchie5:25

    xG 0.55–0.15 (78%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Horvat – Heineman – Shabanov5:32

    xG 0.26–0.11 (71%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Barzal – Heineman – Shabanov7:16

    xG 0.26–0.15 (64%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  4. Duclair – Gatcomb – Ritchie2:02

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Pulock – Schaefer14:11

    xG 0.52–0.53 (50%)attempts 13–16goals 1–0

  2. Mayfield – Mitchell11:42

    xG 0.22–0.26 (45%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  3. Pelech – DeAngelo12:47

    xG 0.45–0.66 (41%)attempts 11–21goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYI 4.0 xGANA 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #475 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50NYI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Islanders win this game 63% of the time.

NYI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (NYI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).