Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 13, 2025·Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul

Ottawa Senators 2, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 73% of the time.

MIN winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT08118110236
MIN0521614325

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:54MINTyler PitlickAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Nico Sturm · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 16:02MINRyan HartmanPPAssists: Marcus Johansson, Danila Yurov · Snap, 0.29 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:37OTTTim StützlePPAssists: Dylan Cozens, Drake Batherson · Poke, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:45OTTDylan CozensPPAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Tim Stützle · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 19:36MINJoel Eriksson EkGWGAssists: Marcus Johansson · Snap, 0.02 xG2–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:34OTTRidly Greig: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P2 4:56OTTDavid Perron: Holding2 min
  3. P2 14:04OTTTyler Kleven: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:34MINDavid Jiricek: Holding2 min
  5. P2 17:58MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 0:00MINRyan Hartman: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 0:00OTTRidly Greig: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 5:09MINKirill Kaprizov: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:33MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 6:33OTTTim Stützle: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 15:28MINDaemon Hunt: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← OTT attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stützle won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTMIN
36Shots on goal25
4.6Expected goals3.0
76Shot attempts42
35Faceoffs won27
4Power plays3
13Penalty minutes15
30Hits21
7Blocked shots19
17Giveaways16
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestZetterlund – Tkachuk – Stützle10:54

    xG 1.24–0.16 (88%)attempts 21–4goals 0–0

  2. Giroux – Amadio – Greig10:06

    xG 0.31–0.25 (55%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Cousins – MacDermid – Halliday2:30

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Perron – Batherson – Cozens9:29

    xG 0.41–0.88 (32%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpence – Kleven7:52

    xG 0.72–0.09 (89%)attempts 12–1goals 0–0

  2. Sanderson – Zub11:50

    xG 0.67–0.34 (66%)attempts 19–5goals 0–1

  3. Spence – Sanderson5:18

    xG 0.44–0.38 (54%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestAube-Kubel – Trenin – Sturm2:54

    xG 0.18–0.09 (67%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  2. Tarasenko – Kaprizov – Yurov8:54

    xG 0.45–0.36 (56%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

  3. Pitlick – Jones – Sturm3:20

    xG 0.09–0.06 (60%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Hartman – Aube-Kubel – Trenin5:21

    xG 0.13–0.31 (29%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Spurgeon12:24

    xG 0.82–0.46 (64%)attempts 14–16goals 2–0

  2. Kiersted – Jiricek9:10

    xG 0.25–0.27 (48%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Hunt2:33

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.0 xGOTT 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #418 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.76 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 40% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +52 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 73% of the time.

MIN winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).