Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 14, 2025·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Philadelphia Flyers 2, Carolina Hurricanes 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI1407115000226
CAR2140907021332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:44CARWilliam CarrierAssists: Sean Walker, Jordan Staal · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:53CARTaylor HallPPAssists: Alexander Nikishin, Jackson Blake · Tip-in, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:07PHIJamie DrysdaleAssists: Trevor Zegras, Matvei Michkov · Snap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:08PHITrevor ZegrasAssists: Travis Konecny, Christian Dvorak · Snap, 0.11 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. CAR Seth Jarvis stopped
  2. 2. PHI Trevor Zegras stopped
  3. 3. CAR Andrei Svechnikov scored
  4. 4. PHI Christian Dvorak stopped
  5. 5. CAR Jackson Blake stopped
  6. 6. PHI Matvei Michkov stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:19PHINoah Juulsen: Kneeing2 min
  2. P1 7:28CARJordan Martinook: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 9:59CARLogan Stankoven: Holding2 min
  4. P1 15:00PHINikita Grebenkin: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:32PHIGarnet Hathaway: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 9:12CARJackson Blake: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 9:12PHIEmil Andrae: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 16:25CARAndrei Svechnikov: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 17:38PHIJamie Drysdale: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 1:46CARSean Walker: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 2:51PHINoah Cates: Tripping2 min
  12. OT 0:42PHIBobby Brink: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jankowski won the faceoff against Abols
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICAR
26Shots on goal32
3.4Expected goals3.3
49Shot attempts80
31Faceoffs won33
4Power plays6
14Penalty minutes10
23Hits10
18Blocked shots10
13Giveaways17
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. Dvorak – Konecny – Zegras8:29

    xG 0.56–0.52 (52%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

  2. Cates – Brink – Grebenkin4:26

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Couturier – Tippett – Michkov7:00

    xG 0.05–0.32 (14%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

  4. Hathaway – Abols – Grundstrom6:12

    xG 0.09–0.48 (16%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Drysdale7:39

    xG 0.72–0.43 (63%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  2. Juulsen – Andrae3:14

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Andrae – Drysdale7:49

    xG 0.35–0.41 (46%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestHall – Jankowski – Robinson6:05

    xG 0.39–0.04 (91%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Aho – Svechnikov – Jarvis9:01

    xG 0.60–0.41 (59%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Martinook – Carrier8:32

    xG 0.43–0.34 (56%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  4. Ehlers – Stankoven – Blake8:33

    xG 0.35–0.49 (42%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Chatfield10:02

    xG 0.54–0.11 (83%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  2. Walker – Miller11:28

    xG 0.49–0.36 (57%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

  3. Walker – Nikishin3:07

    xG 0.25–0.16 (60%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.3 xGPHI 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #320 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).