Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 18, 2025·Centre Bell, Montreal

Chicago Blackhawks 1, Montréal Canadiens 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 87% of the time.

MTL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI140605115
MTL17016312435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:27CHIFrank NazarAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Andre Burakovsky · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:23MTLZachary BolducAssists: Cole Caufield, Lane Hutson · Snap, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:20MTLZachary BolducGWGAssists: Lane Hutson, Nick Suzuki · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 10:00MTLNoah DobsonAssists: Ivan Demidov, Lane Hutson · Backhand, 0.00 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:29MTLNick SuzukiENUnassisted · Snap, 0.35 xG1–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 4:49MTLNoah Dobson: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 15:12CHIDominic Toninato: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 18:12CHIFrank Nazar: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 10:21MTLArber Xhekaj: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← CHI attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Suzuki won the faceoff against Dickinson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIMTL
15Shots on goal35
2.0Expected goals4.7
47Shot attempts65
16Faceoffs won31
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
14Hits21
8Blocked shots13
14Giveaways10
8Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Bertuzzi – Nazar12:14

    xG 0.74–0.54 (58%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  2. Toninato – Donato – Dach7:39

    xG 0.32–0.52 (38%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Lardis – Moore9:52

    xG 0.20–0.54 (28%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

  4. Teravainen – Dickinson – Mikheyev11:24

    xG 0.09–0.58 (14%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – Levshunov14:45

    xG 0.98–0.55 (64%)attempts 17–15goals 1–0

  2. Vlasic – Crevier13:05

    xG 0.19–0.53 (26%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  3. Vlasic – Levshunov4:13

    xG 0.00–0.40 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestKapanen – Slafkovský – Demidov10:20

    xG 0.78–0.21 (79%)attempts 15–6goals 0–1

  2. Suzuki – Caufield – Bolduc11:31

    xG 0.61–0.13 (83%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  3. Gallagher – Veleno – Beck8:14

    xG 0.58–0.20 (74%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  4. Anderson – Evans – Texier10:19

    xG 0.31–0.54 (36%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarrier – Hutson14:26

    xG 0.65–0.06 (92%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Xhekaj – Engstrom9:36

    xG 0.77–0.45 (63%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Dobson – Engstrom4:55

    xG 0.16–0.01 (95%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 4.7 xGCHI 2.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 31/100 · #946 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 87% of the time.

MTL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).