Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 19, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

Dallas Stars 8, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL4738110825
ANA180928325

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:37DALOskar BäckSHAssists: Radek Faksa · Snap, 0.30 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:32ANARyan PoehlingAssists: Radko Gudas, Ross Johnston · Snap, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P1 4:42DALRoope HintzAssists: Jason Robertson, Mavrik Bourque · Snap, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P1 12:41DALSam SteelAssists: Jamie Benn, Miro Heiskanen · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–1
  5. P1 14:19DALThomas HarleyGWGAssists: Mikko Rantanen · Snap, 0.11 xG4–1
  6. P2 11:10DALJason RobertsonPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Miro Heiskanen · Wrist, 0.23 xG5–1
  7. P2 15:10DALJason RobertsonAssists: Roope Hintz · Backhand, 0.09 xG6–1
  8. P2 18:30DALAdam ErneAssists: Radek Faksa, Thomas Harley · Wrist, 0.18 xG7–1
  9. P3 1:01ANABeckett SenneckeAssists: Mason McTavish, Chris Kreider · Snap, 0.05 xG7–2
  10. P3 1:42DALIlya LyubushkinAssists: Justin Hryckowian, Esa Lindell · Snap, 0.03 xG8–2
  11. P3 14:22ANAMikael GranlundAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Troy Terry · Snap, 0.26 xG8–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 1:11DALJason Robertson: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 1:15DALJason Robertson: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 9:44ANAMikael Granlund: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 12:34DALAlexander Petrovic: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 5:01DALJason Robertson: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 5:01ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 5:01ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 5:01ANAFrank Vatrano: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 5:01ANAFrank Vatrano: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← DAL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnston won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALANA
25Shots on goal25
3.2Expected goals2.6
46Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won25
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes18
8Hits22
21Blocked shots13
22Giveaways18
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestFaksa – Erne – Bäck9:02

    xG 0.72–0.43 (63%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Benn – Steel – Hryckowian9:20

    xG 0.30–0.24 (55%)attempts 5–9goals 1–1

  3. Hintz – Robertson – Bourque11:36

    xG 0.76–0.87 (46%)attempts 10–17goals 2–1

  4. Duchene – Rantanen – Johnston10:59

    xG 0.07–0.56 (12%)attempts 8–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindell – Heiskanen7:42

    xG 0.65–0.32 (67%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  2. Lundkvist – Harley11:24

    xG 0.67–0.42 (62%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

  3. Petrovic – Harley2:58

    xG 0.42–0.30 (59%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Vatrano – Terry6:05

    xG 0.41–0.12 (77%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Strome – Johnston – Poehling7:46

    xG 0.34–0.32 (51%)attempts 6–5goals 0–2

  3. Killorn – Gauthier – Carlsson9:55

    xG 0.26–0.39 (40%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  4. Kreider – McTavish – Sennecke9:52

    xG 0.37–0.55 (40%)attempts 18–9goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – LaCombe11:20

    xG 0.71–0.35 (67%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  2. Gudas – Mintyukov16:37

    xG 1.15–0.91 (56%)attempts 24–12goals 1–1

  3. Gudas – Moore2:18

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.6 xGDAL 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANADAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #691 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.89 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).