Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 22, 2025·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Vancouver Canucks 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 89% of the time.

PHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN0501228225
PHI014114411539

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 13:13PHINikita GrebenkinAssists: Emil Andrae, Rodrigo Abols · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P3 5:58PHICarl GrundstromAssists: Nikita Grebenkin, Rodrigo Abols · Snap, 0.24 xG0–2
  3. P3 7:49PHIChristian DvorakGWGAssists: Trevor Zegras, Travis Konecny · Bat, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P3 13:05VANMax SassonAssists: Conor Garland, Tyler Myers · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–3
  5. P3 15:35PHIOwen TippettAssists: Cam York · Snap, 0.23 xG1–4
  6. P3 18:49PHIMatvei MichkovENAssists: Noah Cates · Wrist, 0.53 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:42VANDrew O'ConnorAssists: Zeev Buium, Elias Pettersson · Snap, 0.16 xG2–5
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 10:52PHIChristian Dvorak: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P1 13:51VANTyler Myers: Holding2 min
  3. P1 19:11PHIDenver Barkey: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kampf won the faceoff against Cates
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANPHI
25Shots on goal39
2.4Expected goals5.5
52Shot attempts68
33Faceoffs won24
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
33Hits14
18Blocked shots12
13Giveaways12
3Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Kampf – Sherwood – O'Connor3:42

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Garland – Ohgren – Sasson3:19

    xG 0.57–0.71 (44%)attempts 4–3goals 1–1

  3. Karlsson – Ohgren – Sasson4:43

    xG 0.00–0.23 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–1

  4. DeBrusk – Garland – Kampf4:58

    xG 0.01–0.25 (2%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Buium7:58

    xG 0.40–0.23 (64%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Pettersson – Willander6:49

    xG 0.33–0.29 (53%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Myers – Pettersson9:26

    xG 0.64–0.84 (43%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Tippett – Barkey11:10

    xG 1.58–0.16 (91%)attempts 20–10goals 1–0

  2. Cates – Brink – Michkov10:05

    xG 0.56–0.16 (78%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Dvorak – Konecny – Zegras11:41

    xG 0.65–0.29 (69%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  4. Abols – Grundstrom – Grebenkin9:50

    xG 0.84–0.81 (51%)attempts 8–13goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Ristolainen14:20

    xG 1.29–0.49 (73%)attempts 19–13goals 0–0

  2. Sanheim – York17:40

    xG 1.26–0.58 (69%)attempts 20–21goals 1–0

  3. Andrae – Drysdale17:12

    xG 0.98–0.67 (59%)attempts 14–11goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 5.5 xGVAN 2.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #826 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.75 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 89% of the time.

PHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).