Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 22, 2025·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Los Angeles Kings 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 62% of the time.

LAK winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ21001119330
LAK0111607124

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:07CBJMason MarchmentPPAssists: Damon Severson, Dmitri Voronkov · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:36CBJMason MarchmentPPGWGAssists: Damon Severson, Boone Jenner · Deflected, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P2 18:41LAKAndrei KuzmenkoAssists: Mikey Anderson, Drew Doughty · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P3 14:16CBJKirill MarchenkoPPAssists: Denton Mateychuk, Adam Fantilli · Snap, 0.08 xG3–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:54LAKKevin Fiala: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:27CBJDamon Severson: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 17:32CBJDante Fabbro: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 18:16LAKAndrei Kuzmenko: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 2:59CBJMiles Wood: Interference2 min
  6. P2 8:33LAKCorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 8:33LAKCorey Perry: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 8:33CBJDamon Severson: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 9:48CBJIvan Provorov: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 12:04LAKBrandt Clarke: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 6:27LAKCorey Perry: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 13:55LAKKevin Fiala: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 14:58CBJBoone Jenner: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 16:45LAKCorey Perry: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fantilli won the faceoff against Byfield
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJLAK
30Shots on goal24
3.1Expected goals2.4
57Shot attempts57
32Faceoffs won28
7Power plays5
12Penalty minutes16
15Hits19
12Blocked shots10
14Giveaways15
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Marchment – Marchenko – Fantilli10:36

    xG 0.31–0.29 (52%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

  2. Wood – Monahan – Voronkov5:53

    xG 0.17–0.22 (44%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Coyle – Jenner – Sillinger2:11

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Lundeström – Sillinger – Del Bel Belluz4:38

    xG 0.08–0.20 (30%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Smith – Christiansen7:18

    xG 0.34–0.54 (39%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Provorov – Fabbro13:04

    xG 0.12–0.39 (23%)attempts 9–17goals 0–1

  3. Severson – Mateychuk12:45

    xG 0.23–0.67 (25%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestFiala – Byfield – Laferriere6:53

    xG 0.82–0.14 (86%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Kopitar – Fiala – Kempe2:58

    xG 0.24–0.14 (63%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Foegele – Turcotte – Kuzmenko3:54

    xG 0.20–0.30 (39%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Kopitar – Kempe – Moore4:36

    xG 0.08–0.28 (21%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Anderson11:09

    xG 0.43–0.12 (78%)attempts 18–8goals 1–0

  2. Doughty – Dumoulin2:08

    xG 0.27–0.14 (67%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Edmundson – Clarke10:39

    xG 0.29–0.32 (48%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.4 xGCBJ 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #1093 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 62% of the time.

LAK winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).