Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 28, 2025·United Center, Chicago

Pittsburgh Penguins 7, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT41031202724
CHI072819324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:38PITAnthony ManthaAssists: Jack St. Ivany, Ryan Shea · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:19PITBryan RustAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P1 8:20PITJustin BrazeauAssists: Anthony Mantha, Tommy Novak · Snap, 0.33 xG3–0
  4. P1 12:03PITBryan RustGWGAssists: Ryan Shea, Blake Lizotte · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–0
  5. P2 10:50CHINick FolignoAssists: Colton Dach, Sam Lafferty · Backhand, 0.14 xG4–1
  6. P2 12:20PITJustin BrazeauPPAssists: Ben Kindel, Ville Koivunen · Backhand, 0.19 xG5–1
  7. P2 13:17PITJustin BrazeauAssists: Connor Dewar, Ryan Shea · Tip-in, 0.07 xG6–1
  8. P2 13:30CHIWyatt KaiserAssists: Ryan Greene, Connor Murphy · Wrist, 0.01 xG6–2
  9. P2 18:48PITNoel AcciariAssists: Jack St. Ivany, Blake Lizotte · Wrist, 0.20 xG7–2
  10. P3 19:59CHITyler BertuzziAssists: Jason Dickinson · Wrist, 0.07 xG7–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:56PITBryan Rust: Holding2 min
  2. P1 13:45PITKris Letang: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 18:16PITNoel Acciari: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 18:16CHIConnor Murphy: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 1:54CHINick Lardis: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 12:12CHISam Lafferty: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  7. P3 6:45PITJack St. Ivany: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lizotte won the faceoff against Lafferty
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCHI
24Shots on goal24
2.6Expected goals3.1
37Shot attempts64
31Faceoffs won27
2Power plays3
11Penalty minutes9
17Hits26
17Blocked shots4
20Giveaways15
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivunen – McGroarty – Kindel9:10

    xG 0.63–0.24 (72%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Mantha – Novak – Brazeau9:10

    xG 0.61–0.50 (55%)attempts 7–13goals 2–2

  3. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte8:27

    xG 0.44–0.41 (52%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Rakell13:37

    xG 0.23–0.80 (22%)attempts 5–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShea – St. Ivany13:03

    xG 1.00–0.59 (63%)attempts 13–15goals 3–0

  2. Kulak – St. Ivany2:37

    xG 0.22–0.16 (59%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

  3. Wotherspoon – St. Ivany2:40

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDickinson – Bertuzzi – Slaggert10:39

    xG 0.74–0.27 (73%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  2. Greene – Lardis – Moore10:44

    xG 0.58–0.28 (67%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  3. Foligno – Lafferty – Dach8:51

    xG 0.32–0.27 (55%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  4. Foligno – Dickinson – Slaggert2:14

    xG 0.04–0.12 (28%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Crevier14:07

    xG 0.96–0.20 (82%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Murphy – Kaiser9:41

    xG 0.38–0.22 (63%)attempts 9–7goals 2–1

  3. Vlasic – Levshunov2:15

    xG 0.20–0.09 (69%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.1 xGPIT 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #833 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.66 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).