Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 29, 2025·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Ottawa Senators 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 62% of the time.

OTT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ1121327422
OTT07110011128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:58CBJBoone JennerAssists: Cole Sillinger, Charlie Coyle · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:21CBJDamon SeversonGWGAssists: Dmitri Voronkov, Cole Sillinger · Slap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:16OTTJake SandersonAssists: Tim Stützle, Brady Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:57CBJDenton MateychukAssists: Damon Severson, Charlie Coyle · Snap, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 15:54CBJKirill MarchenkoAssists: Mason Marchment, Adam Fantilli · Snap, 0.12 xG4–1
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:03CBJCole Sillinger: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:26OTTFabian Zetterlund: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 16:01OTTKurtis MacDermid: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:01CBJMathieu Olivier: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:52OTTDylan Cozens: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:24CBJDante Fabbro: Holding2 min
  7. P2 10:47CBJDamon Severson: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 12:56OTTDavid Perron: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 14:27CBJMason Marchment: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fantilli won the faceoff against Pinto
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJOTT
22Shots on goal28
2.8Expected goals2.2
47Shot attempts60
30Faceoffs won27
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
23Hits18
16Blocked shots10
20Giveaways14
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Jenner – Olivier7:26

    xG 0.24–0.08 (74%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  2. Gaunce – Aston-Reese – Johnson6:50

    xG 0.10–0.15 (40%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Wood – Voronkov – Sillinger8:12

    xG 0.27–0.32 (46%)attempts 7–11goals 1–1

  4. Marchment – Marchenko – Fantilli10:48

    xG 0.37–0.55 (40%)attempts 6–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – Mateychuk2:07

    xG 0.14–0.05 (74%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

  2. Severson – Mateychuk12:45

    xG 0.45–0.40 (53%)attempts 7–16goals 2–1

  3. Provorov – Fabbro12:23

    xG 0.20–0.22 (48%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestZetterlund – Tkachuk – Stützle2:52

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Cousins – Amadio – Pinto3:49

    xG 0.24–0.12 (67%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Batherson – Tkachuk – Cozens4:02

    xG 0.20–0.13 (60%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Amadio – Pinto3:28

    xG 0.04–0.13 (25%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChabot – Spence14:15

    xG 0.54–0.42 (56%)attempts 17–10goals 0–3

  2. Sanderson – Zub11:24

    xG 0.34–0.38 (48%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  3. Kleven – Matinpalo10:21

    xG 0.10–0.27 (28%)attempts 3–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.2 xGCBJ 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #914 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 62% of the time.

OTT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).