Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 29, 2025·Ball Arena, Denver

Los Angeles Kings 2, Colorado Avalanche 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 74% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK01015110225
COL1821028526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:24COLJack DruryAssists: Ross Colton · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:15LAKCorey PerryPPAssists: Kevin Fiala, Joel Edmundson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:21COLMartin NecasAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Nathan MacKinnon · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:30COLBrock NelsonGWGAssists: Joel Kiviranta, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:58LAKJoel ArmiaSHAssists: Adrian Kempe · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:23COLNathan MacKinnonENAssists: Artturi Lehkonen · Wrist, 0.49 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:15COLCale MakarAssists: Valeri Nichushkin, Brock Nelson · Snap, 0.07 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 15:43LAKAndrei Kuzmenko: Interference2 min
  2. P2 3:18COLParker Kelly: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:54LAKBrian Dumoulin: Interference2 min
  4. P2 9:58COLRoss Colton: Interference2 min
  5. P2 14:10LAKBrandt Clarke: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 3:44LAKBrandt Clarke: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 9:00COLJack Drury: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nelson won the faceoff against Byfield
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCOL
25Shots on goal26
1.8Expected goals3.2
53Shot attempts59
27Faceoffs won27
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
29Hits18
11Blocked shots9
18Giveaways17
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestFiala – Turcotte – Kuzmenko7:11

    xG 0.40–0.11 (78%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  2. Kopitar – Kempe – Laferriere7:21

    xG 0.24–0.19 (56%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  3. Perry – Armia – Helenius2:57

    xG 0.02–0.04 (35%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Kopitar – Fiala – Kempe2:11

    xG 0.04–0.11 (26%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Doughty – Dumoulin2:57

    xG 0.06–0.12 (33%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Edmundson – Clarke11:51

    xG 0.22–0.33 (39%)attempts 7–11goals 0–2

  3. Dumoulin – Ceci11:31

    xG 0.59–0.76 (44%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Necas12:10

    xG 0.89–0.31 (74%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Kelly – Kiviranta – Brindley4:55

    xG 0.14–0.14 (50%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Olofsson – Colton – Drury6:46

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  4. Nelson – Lehkonen – Nichushkin10:18

    xG 0.19–0.45 (30%)attempts 6–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar13:07

    xG 0.89–0.39 (69%)attempts 19–14goals 2–0

  2. Girard – Malinski12:18

    xG 0.33–0.25 (58%)attempts 9–12goals 2–0

  3. Burns – Manson13:43

    xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.2 xGLAK 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #614 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 74% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).