Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 29, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Vancouver Canucks 3, Seattle Kraken 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 70% of the time.

SEA winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN1121903001324
SEA21406016030239

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:50SEAJared McCannPPAssists: Vince Dunn, Jordan Eberle · Slap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:20VANLinus KarlssonAssists: Liam Ohgren · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:40SEARyan WintertonAssists: Jacob Melanson, Joey Daccord · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:23VANElias PetterssonAssists: Evander Kane, Tom Willander · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. SEA Frederick Gaudreau stopped
  2. 2. VAN Conor Garland stopped
  3. 3. SEA Eeli Tolvanen stopped
  4. 4. SEA Jordan Eberle stopped
  5. 5. VAN Liam Ohgren scored
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:42VANTyler Myers: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 7:41SEAShane Wright: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 7:51VANLinus Karlsson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 8:46VANNils Hoglander: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P1 15:17VANConor Garland: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 15:17SEAJared McCann: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 5:38VANElias Pettersson: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 16:01SEAEeli Tolvanen: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 5:27VANElias Pettersson: Slashing2 min
  10. OT 3:20VANEvander Kane: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against Rossi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSEA
24Shots on goal39
2.3Expected goals3.5
65Shot attempts63
35Faceoffs won29
2Power plays6
17Penalty minutes9
22Hits21
15Blocked shots17
12Giveaways14
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestKarlsson – Rossi – Ohgren2:35

    xG 0.19–0.03 (86%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Garland – Rossi – Ohgren8:46

    xG 0.44–0.43 (51%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Hoglander – Sasson5:59

    xG 0.24–0.38 (39%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Sherwood – O'Connor – Räty7:37

    xG 0.05–0.23 (18%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Hronek14:25

    xG 0.54–0.29 (65%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Myers – Buium2:14

    xG 0.19–0.13 (60%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Willander – Buium8:18

    xG 0.21–0.21 (51%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestWinterton – Melanson – Meyers5:59

    xG 0.63–0.09 (87%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Stephenson – Gaudreau – Tolvanen13:33

    xG 0.65–0.41 (61%)attempts 14–17goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – Kakko – Beniers10:34

    xG 0.37–0.33 (52%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  4. McCann – Wright – Catton6:57

    xG 0.16–0.54 (23%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindgren – Fleury15:26

    xG 0.92–0.54 (63%)attempts 14–15goals 1–1

  2. Larsson – Dunn16:28

    xG 0.75–0.40 (65%)attempts 20–18goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Evans11:40

    xG 0.20–0.57 (26%)attempts 9–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.5 xGVAN 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #700 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 70% of the time.

SEA winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).