Sat, Jan 3, 2026·Enterprise Center, St. Louis
Montréal Canadiens 0, St. Louis Blues 2
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTL | 09 | 010 | 07 | 026 |
| STL | 18 | 17 | 04 | 219 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 10:48STLJonatan BerggrenGWGAssists: Cam Fowler, Otto Stenberg · Snap, 0.09 xG0–1
- P2 10:13STLRobert ThomasSHAssists: Alexey Toropchenko · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–2
Penalties (6)
- P1 2:27MTLNoah Dobson: High sticking2 min
- P2 9:02STLPavel Buchnevich: Tripping2 min
- P2 13:20STLBrayden Schenn: Tripping2 min
- P2 13:43STLColton Parayko: High sticking2 min
- P2 15:36MTLBrendan Gallagher: Hooking2 min
- P3 2:14STLPavel Buchnevich: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Suzuki won the faceoff against Thomas
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Montréal Canadiens
Forward lines
- bestGallagher – Danault – Bolduc9:36
xG 0.73–0.28 (72%)attempts 14–5goals 0–1
- Blais – Veleno – Beck6:05
xG 0.24–0.37 (39%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0
- Suzuki – Texier – Caufield10:45
xG 0.11–0.36 (24%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
- Kapanen – Slafkovský – Demidov8:59
xG 0.25–0.60 (29%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestCarrier – Hutson13:57
xG 0.82–0.56 (59%)attempts 18–11goals 0–0
- Dobson – Hutson4:21
xG 0.10–0.13 (45%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Struble – Xhekaj6:13
xG 0.11–0.30 (27%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestFabbri – Joseph – Toropchenko7:17
xG 0.19–0.05 (77%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
- Berggren – Dvorsky – Stenberg7:52
xG 0.19–0.07 (73%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0
- Kyrou – Thomas – Neighbours10:32
xG 0.35–0.23 (60%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0
- Schenn – Buchnevich – Snuggerud10:15
xG 0.77–0.78 (50%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFowler – Mailloux11:32
xG 0.72–0.36 (67%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0
- Faulk – Tucker12:48
xG 0.68–0.37 (65%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0
- Parayko – Broberg16:19
xG 0.19–0.79 (19%)attempts 8–22goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (STL − MTL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).