Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 3, 2026·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Nashville Predators 4, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 57% of the time.

CGY winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH21611317436
CGY2110319323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:56CGYYan KuznetsovAssists: MacKenzie Weegar, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:19NSHErik HaulaAssists: Michael Bunting, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:52NSHErik HaulaAssists: Steven Stamkos, Michael Bunting · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P1 13:41CGYRasmus AnderssonAssists: Matt Coronato · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:08NSHMichael BuntingUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:49CGYBlake ColemanAssists: Mikael Backlund, Matt Coronato · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:31NSHNicolas HagueGWGAssists: Michael Bunting, Michael McCarron · Slap, 0.02 xG4–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 13:15NSHCole Smith: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 13:15CGYRyan Lomberg: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:15CGYJohn Beecher: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 13:15NSHMichael McCarron: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 13:15NSHMichael McCarron: Misconduct10 min
  6. P1 13:15CGYJohn Beecher: Misconduct10 min
  7. P1 15:20CGYKevin Bahl: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 6:57NSHFedor Svechkov: Holding2 min
  9. P2 9:52NSHNicolas Hague: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 9:52CGYJohn Beecher: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 13:55CGYBlake Coleman: Cross checking2 min
  12. P2 13:55NSHMichael Bunting: Embellishment2 min
  13. P3 2:05NSHErik Haula: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCGY
36Shots on goal23
2.6Expected goals2.2
63Shot attempts52
42Faceoffs won31
1Power plays2
28Penalty minutes26
23Hits26
15Blocked shots12
22Giveaways17
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Haula – Bunting9:37

    xG 0.52–0.08 (87%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  2. Jost – Smith – Svechkov2:20

    xG 0.04–0.04 (44%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Stamkos – O'Reilly – Forsberg2:08

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Haula – Bunting – Evangelista2:26

    xG 0.08–0.15 (34%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHague – Blankenburg11:26

    xG 0.63–0.10 (86%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  2. Josi – Perbix13:39

    xG 0.72–0.60 (55%)attempts 12–20goals 1–1

  3. Hague – Barron2:23

    xG 0.09–0.08 (52%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestLomberg – Beecher – Zary2:03

    xG 0.30–0.06 (84%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Backlund – Coleman – Coronato13:23

    xG 0.69–0.65 (52%)attempts 13–16goals 2–0

  3. Huberdeau – Frost – Farabee4:50

    xG 0.01–0.02 (28%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

  4. Kadri – Farabee – Sharangovich5:44

    xG 0.05–0.15 (26%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Weegar – Kuznetsov17:37

    xG 0.94–0.96 (49%)attempts 19–22goals 1–2

  2. Andersson – Bahl20:38

    xG 0.67–0.80 (46%)attempts 20–23goals 2–0

  3. Hanley – Brzustewicz9:19

    xG 0.06–0.30 (15%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.2 xGNSH 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #444 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.84 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 57% of the time.

CGY winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).