Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 3, 2026·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

Minnesota Wild 4, Los Angeles Kings 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 67% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN1518212031428
LAK11119213062539

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:08LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Anze Kopitar, Alex Laferriere · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:28MINJake MiddletonAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Zach Bogosian · Snap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:57LAKCorey PerryPPAssists: Quinton Byfield, Brandt Clarke · Deflected, 0.18 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:23MINJoel Eriksson EkPPAssists: Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:54LAKQuinton ByfieldUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:33MINBrock FaberAssists: Danila Yurov, Kirill Kaprizov · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:09LAKSamuel HeleniusAssists: Kevin Fiala, Alex Turcotte · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:03MINMatt BoldyAssists: Brock Faber, Marcus Foligno · Deflected, 0.15 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Kevin Fiala stopped
  2. 2. MIN Mats Zuccarello stopped
  3. 3. LAK Adrian Kempe scored
  4. 4. MIN Matt Boldy scored
  5. 5. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  6. 6. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  7. 7. LAK Brandt Clarke scored
  8. 8. MIN Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 0:12LAKQuinton Byfield: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 5:13MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 6:42LAKJoel Armia: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 15:30MINBrock Faber: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 18:07LAKQuinton Byfield: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P3 17:28LAKAlex Laferriere: Slashing2 min
  7. OT 3:28MINBrock Faber: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Byfield won the faceoff against Yurov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINLAK
28Shots on goal39
3.4Expected goals4.6
70Shot attempts84
32Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
17Hits15
21Blocked shots18
16Giveaways19
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Kaprizov – Yurov11:33

    xG 0.79–0.44 (64%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Trenin – Sturm8:30

    xG 0.47–0.36 (57%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy10:21

    xG 0.31–0.38 (45%)attempts 12–16goals 0–0

  4. Tarasenko – Hinostroza – Hartman7:13

    xG 0.06–1.56 (4%)attempts 7–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Brodin13:56

    xG 0.35–0.34 (51%)attempts 12–16goals 0–0

  2. Bogosian – Middleton10:52

    xG 0.32–0.65 (33%)attempts 11–20goals 1–1

  3. Hughes – Faber17:24

    xG 0.51–1.67 (24%)attempts 16–21goals 2–2

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestFiala – Turcotte – Kuzmenko9:30

    xG 0.87–0.19 (82%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0

  2. Kopitar – Kempe – Laferriere8:48

    xG 0.46–0.25 (64%)attempts 18–11goals 1–1

  3. Armia – Foegele – Byfield8:44

    xG 0.24–0.29 (45%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  4. Perry – Malott – Helenius3:04

    xG 0.01–0.09 (9%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Ceci15:14

    xG 1.55–0.57 (73%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  2. Edmundson – Clarke11:21

    xG 0.87–0.34 (72%)attempts 22–10goals 1–0

  3. Doughty – Clarke2:11

    xG 0.09–0.02 (84%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 4.6 xGMIN 3.4 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #49 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.42 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 67% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).