Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 4, 2026·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 68% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT1912121112543
CBJ312160700425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:50PITVille KoivunenAssists: Ben Kindel, Jack St. Ivany · Snap, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:21CBJDmitri VoronkovAssists: Denton Mateychuk · Tip-in, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:48CBJMason MarchmentAssists: Adam Fantilli, Kirill Marchenko · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:38CBJKirill MarchenkoAssists: Zach Werenski, Denton Mateychuk · Snap, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 0:47CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Boone Jenner, Mathieu Olivier · Snap, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:51PITNoel AcciariAssists: Connor Dewar · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 3:28PITTommy NovakPPAssists: Ben Kindel · Slap, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:46PITRickard RakellAssists: Anthony Mantha, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.20 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:22PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Erik Karlsson, Egor Chinakhov · Backhand, 0.19 xG5–4
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 9:14CBJIvan Provorov: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 13:37CBJAdam Fantilli: Cross checking2 min
  3. P3 2:06CBJDmitri Voronkov: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
43Shots on goal25
4.1Expected goals2.9
92Shot attempts53
34Faceoffs won30
3Power plays0
0Penalty minutes6
14Hits22
14Blocked shots19
14Giveaways21
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAcciari – Dewar – Lizotte11:02

    xG 0.67–0.19 (78%)attempts 19–7goals 1–1

  2. Chinakhov – Koivunen – Kindel9:15

    xG 0.81–0.46 (64%)attempts 21–4goals 1–1

  3. Crosby – Rust – Rakell14:30

    xG 1.04–0.88 (54%)attempts 21–15goals 0–1

  4. Mantha – Novak – Brazeau8:07

    xG 0.44–0.45 (49%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Wotherspoon16:08

    xG 0.98–0.30 (76%)attempts 25–7goals 0–0

  2. Shea – St. Ivany13:23

    xG 1.31–0.70 (65%)attempts 23–13goals 2–2

  3. Letang – Kulak15:34

    xG 0.63–0.94 (40%)attempts 22–19goals 0–2

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchment – Marchenko – Fantilli14:20

    xG 0.78–0.52 (60%)attempts 15–17goals 2–1

  2. Gaunce – Aston-Reese – Johnson7:05

    xG 0.40–0.17 (70%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Coyle – Jenner – Olivier13:50

    xG 0.53–1.23 (30%)attempts 10–19goals 1–0

  4. Heinen – Voronkov – Sillinger8:48

    xG 0.20–1.01 (16%)attempts 4–20goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Severson – Provorov18:53

    xG 1.10–1.12 (50%)attempts 16–24goals 1–0

  2. Werenski – Mateychuk18:05

    xG 0.67–0.69 (49%)attempts 19–20goals 3–0

  3. Provorov – Fabbro2:13

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.9 xGPIT 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #45 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +52 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 68% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).