Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 10, 2026·Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul

New York Islanders 4, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

MIN winsNYI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NYI172110812428
MIN2111801700336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:51MINBen JonesAssists: Brock Faber, Quinn Hughes · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:18NYIJean-Gabriel PageauUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:25MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, Mats Zuccarello · Slap, 0.18 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:29NYISimon HolmstromAssists: Tony DeAngelo · Snap, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:26MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Daemon Hunt, Quinn Hughes · Snap, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:34NYICasey CizikasSHAssists: Simon Holmstrom · Backhand, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:34NYISimon HolmstromGWGAssists: Tony DeAngelo, Jonathan Drouin · Backhand, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:23NYIMaxim Tsyplakov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:58MINRyan Hartman: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 13:28NYICalum Ritchie: Boarding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 14:59NYIScott Mayfield: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 4:56MINJake Middleton: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 13:25MINDanila Yurov: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 18:18NYITony DeAngelo: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← NYI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Yurov won the faceoff against Barzal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYIMIN
28Shots on goal36
3.3Expected goals4.1
60Shot attempts65
36Faceoffs won26
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
15Hits18
9Blocked shots14
7Giveaways16
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. bestCizikas – Gatcomb – Tsyplakov6:42

    xG 0.42–0.15 (73%)attempts 13–4goals 0–1

  2. Pageau – Holmstrom – Shabanov11:07

    xG 1.22–1.00 (55%)attempts 9–17goals 2–0

  3. Drouin – Heineman – Ritchie8:45

    xG 0.17–0.26 (40%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Lee – Duclair – Barzal11:16

    xG 0.61–0.83 (42%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPelech – DeAngelo11:55

    xG 1.54–0.64 (71%)attempts 19–9goals 2–1

  2. Mayfield – Pelech2:59

    xG 0.18–0.09 (67%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Mayfield – Schaefer2:14

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Kaprizov – Yurov12:32

    xG 1.99–0.48 (80%)attempts 23–9goals 1–0

  2. Hinostroza – Trenin – Jones5:49

    xG 0.39–0.19 (68%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Foligno – Tarasenko – Sturm8:18

    xG 0.04–0.21 (17%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Johansson – Hartman – Boldy8:20

    xG 0.57–1.40 (29%)attempts 12–15goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestHughes – Faber19:54

    xG 1.52–0.71 (68%)attempts 29–16goals 1–0

  2. Middleton – Hunt10:35

    xG 0.44–0.13 (77%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin12:07

    xG 1.14–1.69 (40%)attempts 15–21goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 4.1 xGNYI 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNYI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #326 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.08 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
NYI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

MIN winsNYI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NYI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).