Fri, Jan 16, 2026·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles
Anaheim Ducks 3, Los Angeles Kings 2 (SO)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 62% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | SO | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 06 | 211 | 08 | 03 | 2 | 328 |
| LAK | 110 | 112 | 05 | 01 | 1 | 228 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 1:38LAKQuinton ByfieldAssists: Joel Armia · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
- P2 11:33LAKJoel ArmiaAssists: Andre Lee · Slap, 0.13 xG0–2
- P2 12:12ANARyan StromeAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Beckett Sennecke · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
- P2 14:56ANATim WasheAssists: Jacob Trouba, Beckett Sennecke · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
Shootout
- 1. LAK Adrian Kempe stopped
- 2. ANA Mikael Granlund stopped
- 3. LAK Brandt Clarke scored
- 4. ANA Beckett Sennecke scored
- 5. LAK Kevin Fiala stopped
- 6. ANA Mason McTavish scored
Penalties (7)
- P1 3:39LAKJeff Malott: Too many men on the ice2 min
- P1 14:12ANAAlex Killorn: Holding2 min
- P1 17:25LAKBrian Dumoulin: Cross checking2 min
- P2 4:50ANABeckett Sennecke: Interference bench2 min
- P2 9:22ANARoss Johnston: Hooking2 min
- P2 19:19LAKDarcy Kuemper: Roughing2 min
- P2 19:19ANALukas Dostal: Goalie leave crease2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against Laferriere
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestStrome – McTavish – Sennecke3:21
xG 0.34–0.24 (59%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0
- Harkins – Poehling – Colangelo7:54
xG 0.14–0.32 (30%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0
- Killorn – Granlund – Sennecke11:45
xG 0.57–0.83 (41%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0
- Strome – McTavish – Gauthier5:13
xG 0.16–0.54 (23%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestTrouba – LaCombe12:56
xG 0.64–0.50 (56%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0
- Gudas – Zellweger11:25
xG 0.51–0.82 (38%)attempts 11–16goals 0–1
- Helleson – Mintyukov8:51
xG 0.27–1.17 (19%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1
Los Angeles Kings
Forward lines
- bestFiala – Turcotte – Kuzmenko9:50
xG 0.81–0.27 (75%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0
- Armia – Foegele – Byfield9:12
xG 0.71–0.21 (77%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0
- Kempe – Laferriere – Malott8:50
xG 0.26–0.13 (67%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0
- Lee – Helenius – Ward7:35
xG 0.16–0.20 (45%)attempts 4–13goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestDoughty – Anderson14:39
xG 1.21–0.77 (61%)attempts 21–18goals 1–2
- Dumoulin – Ceci14:50
xG 0.67–0.35 (66%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0
- Edmundson – Clarke11:12
xG 0.55–0.59 (48%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 62% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (LAK − ANA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).