Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 20, 2026·Centre Bell, Montreal

Minnesota Wild 3, Montréal Canadiens 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 58% of the time.

MTL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1211018320
MTL2151919433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:44MINVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Quinn Hughes · Snap, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:22MTLPhillip DanaultAssists: Josh Anderson, Kaiden Guhle · Snap, 0.25 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:08MTLAlexandre CarrierAssists: Mike Matheson, Ivan Demidov · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:16MINBrock FaberAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Vinnie Hinostroza · Snap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:35MTLLane HutsonAssists: Ivan Demidov, Jayden Struble · Slap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:40MINVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:45MTLCole CaufieldGWGAssists: Nick Suzuki, Lane Hutson · Slap, 0.08 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 10:29MTLPhillip Danault: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:53MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 18:21MINRyan Hartman: Interference2 min
  4. P2 18:47MTLLane Hutson: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 4:45MINNico Sturm: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 10:33MTLLane Hutson: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 11:49MTLMike Matheson: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Suzuki won the faceoff against Hartman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINMTL
20Shots on goal33
2.1Expected goals2.6
47Shot attempts75
29Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
17Hits18
22Blocked shots12
16Giveaways16
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Hinostroza – Haight8:31

    xG 0.27–0.13 (68%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  2. Tarasenko – Trenin – Sturm2:25

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–1

  3. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov15:58

    xG 0.48–0.64 (43%)attempts 14–17goals 0–1

  4. Pitlick – Jones – Sturm4:27

    xG 0.05–0.21 (19%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Middleton15:37

    xG 0.57–0.81 (41%)attempts 11–20goals 0–1

  2. Hughes – Faber21:54

    xG 0.52–0.86 (37%)attempts 18–23goals 1–1

  3. Hunt – Spacek8:00

    xG 0.05–0.68 (7%)attempts 1–24goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestKapanen – Slafkovský – Demidov10:12

    xG 0.86–0.43 (67%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

  2. Suzuki – Dach – Caufield13:05

    xG 0.34–0.16 (68%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  3. Gallagher – Danault – Anderson8:03

    xG 0.53–0.41 (57%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  4. Evans – Veleno – Bolduc8:24

    xG 0.32–0.22 (60%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarrier – Guhle11:52

    xG 1.04–0.31 (77%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

  2. Struble – Hutson10:07

    xG 0.52–0.38 (58%)attempts 22–6goals 1–0

  3. Dobson – Hutson3:06

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 2.6 xGMIN 2.1 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #189 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.31 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +52 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 58% of the time.

MTL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).