Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 21, 2026·Delta Center, Salt Lake City

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Utah Mammoth 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 69% of the time.

UTA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI2142100500429
UTA072102911527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:30PHICam YorkAssists: Christian Dvorak, Travis Sanheim · Snap, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:36PHIChristian DvorakAssists: Travis Konecny, Noah Juulsen · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–0
  3. P2 0:58PHIBobby BrinkPPAssists: Trevor Zegras, Jamie Drysdale · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–0
  4. P2 5:35UTAJJ PeterkaAssists: Daniil But · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–1
  5. P2 6:11UTALawson CrouseAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Clayton Keller · Slap, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P2 10:28PHIChristian DvorakPPAssists: Trevor Zegras, Jamie Drysdale · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 12:47UTADylan GuentherPPAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Mikhail Sergachev · Tip-in, 0.01 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:25UTAClayton KellerUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:01UTAClayton KellerGWGAssists: Dylan Guenther · Snap, 0.20 xG4–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:39PHINick Seeler: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 2:18UTABarrett Hayton: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 5:18UTALiam O'Brien: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 0:00UTANick Schmaltz: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:35UTABrandon Tanev: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:00UTAJJ Peterka: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 14:54PHINick Seeler: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 19:52UTAIan Cole: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 11:49PHINoah Juulsen: Roughing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 11:49UTAJack McBain: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 11:49PHINoah Juulsen: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0UTA
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackUTA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Schmaltz
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIUTA
29Shots on goal27
4.0Expected goals2.8
60Shot attempts69
34Faceoffs won26
6Power plays3
11Penalty minutes17
25Hits26
18Blocked shots11
20Giveaways13
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Konecny – Zegras8:25

    xG 1.00–0.35 (74%)attempts 7–12goals 2–0

  2. Couturier – Tippett – Barkey7:09

    xG 0.65–0.22 (74%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Hathaway – Pederson – Grebenkin7:01

    xG 0.04–0.14 (24%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  4. Cates – Brink – Michkov7:51

    xG 0.14–0.29 (32%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Drysdale4:14

    xG 0.17–0.11 (60%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  2. Andrae – Drysdale7:59

    xG 0.54–0.50 (52%)attempts 6–12goals 0–1

  3. Seeler – Juulsen10:03

    xG 0.31–0.27 (54%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

Utah Mammoth

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Brien – Stenlund – Tanev4:22

    xG 0.33–0.18 (65%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Hayton – Peterka – But8:55

    xG 0.36–0.22 (63%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Carcone – McBain – Guenther9:04

    xG 0.55–0.64 (46%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0

  4. Schmaltz – Crouse – Keller10:07

    xG 0.43–0.84 (34%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – DeSimone9:24

    xG 0.52–0.38 (58%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Sergachev – Durzi13:01

    xG 0.64–0.77 (45%)attempts 15–14goals 2–1

  3. Schmidt – Marino14:55

    xG 0.47–0.88 (35%)attempts 20–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

UTA 2.8 xGPHI 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

UTAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

UTA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line UTA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #36 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.31 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50UTA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 69% of the time.

UTA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (UTA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).