Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 22, 2026·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Dallas Stars 0, Columbus Blue Jackets 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 77% of the time.

CBJ winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL06012010028
CBJ190706122

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:48CBJZach WerenskiGWGAssists: Damon Severson, Isac Lundeström · Snap, 0.03 xG0–1
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 11:31DALJustin Hryckowian: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:57CBJMason Marchment: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 1:17CBJDamon Severson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← DAL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnston won the faceoff against Coyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALCBJ
28Shots on goal22
2.9Expected goals1.5
61Shot attempts46
26Faceoffs won27
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
7Hits35
10Blocked shots17
14Giveaways14
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestHintz – Robertson – Bourque11:13

    xG 0.38–0.11 (77%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Duchene – Steel – Johnston12:28

    xG 0.62–0.42 (59%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  3. Benn – Bäck – Hryckowian8:07

    xG 0.47–0.30 (61%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  4. Blackwell – Faksa – Bastian5:37

    xG 0.19–0.10 (66%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindell – Heiskanen15:31

    xG 0.97–0.34 (74%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0

  2. Petrovic – Lyubushkin10:20

    xG 0.38–0.22 (63%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. Lyubushkin – Harley3:34

    xG 0.08–0.04 (65%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHeinen – Lundeström – Voronkov4:08

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  2. Marchment – Marchenko – Fantilli12:52

    xG 0.44–0.47 (48%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  3. Jenner – Monahan – Johnson7:14

    xG 0.04–0.22 (14%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Coyle – Olivier – Sillinger10:34

    xG 0.28–0.47 (37%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeverson – Werenski20:54

    xG 0.84–0.64 (57%)attempts 20–18goals 1–0

  2. Christiansen – Zamula7:59

    xG 0.15–0.06 (71%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Gudbranson – Provorov15:14

    xG 0.08–1.02 (7%)attempts 9–23goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.5 xGDAL 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 1/100 · #1306 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 1 goal in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 77% of the time.

CBJ winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).