Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 28, 2026·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 51% of the time.

CBJ winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI1706214327
CBJ2711628531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:38CBJCharlie CoyleAssists: Mathieu Olivier, Zach Werenski · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:03PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Cam York, Noah Juulsen · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:40CBJKirill MarchenkoAssists: Zach Werenski, Adam Fantilli · Snap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:58CBJErik GudbransonAssists: Cole Sillinger, Charlie Coyle · Slap, 0.02 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:08PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Christian Dvorak, Jamie Drysdale · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:14PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Travis Sanheim · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 16:32CBJSean MonahanGWGAssists: Damon Severson, Kent Johnson · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:54CBJMathieu OlivierENAssists: Cole Sillinger · Wrist, 0.75 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 14:50PHITravis Sanheim: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 18:20CBJCole Sillinger: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 19:12PHIMatvei Michkov: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 14:56CBJDmitri Voronkov: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P3 0:42PHIChristian Dvorak: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 1:57CBJMason Marchment: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 12:04CBJKent Johnson: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 19:48CBJErik Gudbranson: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Coyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICBJ
27Shots on goal31
3.6Expected goals3.7
55Shot attempts60
22Faceoffs won36
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
21Hits17
18Blocked shots11
9Giveaways12
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Tippett – Barkey8:31

    xG 0.23–0.06 (79%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  2. Dvorak – Konecny – Zegras10:48

    xG 0.49–0.50 (50%)attempts 11–12goals 2–2

  3. Pederson – Grundstrom – Grebenkin5:43

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  4. Cates – Brink – Michkov7:14

    xG 0.32–0.50 (39%)attempts 4–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJuulsen – York2:52

    xG 0.30–0.01 (98%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Seeler – Drysdale5:35

    xG 0.27–0.06 (81%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Sanheim – Drysdale5:08

    xG 0.36–0.16 (69%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchment – Marchenko – Fantilli11:55

    xG 0.55–0.18 (76%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Coyle – Olivier – Sillinger9:06

    xG 0.43–0.16 (73%)attempts 11–5goals 2–0

  3. Jenner – Monahan – Johnson9:38

    xG 0.27–0.36 (42%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  4. Wood – Lundeström – Voronkov5:37

    xG 0.01–0.15 (8%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – Mateychuk13:03

    xG 0.64–0.22 (74%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0

  2. Severson – Werenski14:19

    xG 0.75–0.68 (53%)attempts 17–10goals 2–2

  3. Gudbranson – Zamula10:47

    xG 0.13–0.28 (33%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.7 xGPHI 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #181 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.07 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 51% of the time.

CBJ winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).