Thu, Jan 29, 2026·Rogers Arena, Vancouver
Anaheim Ducks 0, Vancouver Canucks 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 53% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 09 | 014 | 010 | 033 |
| VAN | 09 | 08 | 29 | 226 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P3 10:18VANDrew O'ConnorGWGAssists: Jake DeBrusk · Slap, 0.15 xG0–1
- P3 19:32VANTeddy BluegerENAssists: Filip Hronek · Wrist, 0.30 xG0–2
Penalties (6)
- P1 8:48VANJake DeBrusk: Tripping2 min
- P1 14:39ANAJeffrey Viel: Slashing2 min
- P1 17:59ANARyan Poehling: Interference goalkeeper2 min
- P2 4:23VANTyler Myers: Holding2 min
- P3 2:53ANADrew Helleson: Cross checking2 min
- P3 19:11VANConor Garland: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against Pettersson
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestKillorn – Granlund – Sennecke12:09
xG 0.91–0.33 (74%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1
- Kreider – Harkins – Colangelo6:59
xG 0.28–0.18 (61%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0
- Kreider – Poehling – Gauthier2:01
xG 0.04–0.02 (70%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0
- Viel – Poehling – Gauthier10:53
xG 0.54–0.59 (48%)attempts 13–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGudas – Zellweger9:26
xG 1.00–0.15 (87%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0
- Trouba – LaCombe14:56
xG 0.54–0.73 (42%)attempts 10–17goals 0–1
- Helleson – Mintyukov9:00
xG 0.18–0.43 (30%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestChytil – Kampf – Karlsson8:21
xG 0.52–0.22 (70%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0
- Kane – Garland – Pettersson9:41
xG 0.46–0.30 (61%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0
- DeBrusk – O'Connor – Räty7:52
xG 0.26–0.15 (64%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0
- Blueger – Lekkerimäki – Ohgren5:02
xG 0.10–0.51 (16%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMyers – Joseph11:01
xG 0.58–0.48 (55%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0
- Hronek – Pettersson14:59
xG 0.70–0.61 (54%)attempts 19–15goals 1–0
- Myers – Pettersson3:29
xG 0.03–0.04 (40%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 53% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (VAN − ANA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).