Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 1, 2026·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Los Angeles Kings 2, Carolina Hurricanes 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 88% of the time.

CAR winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
LAK04042500213
CAR1401411313334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:25CARJordan StaalPPAssists: Andrei Svechnikov, Shayne Gostisbehere · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P3 12:57CARAlexander NikishinUnassisted · Snap, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P3 13:21LAKSamuel HeleniusAssists: Jeff Malott, Brian Dumoulin · Snap, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P3 16:49LAKQuinton ByfieldAssists: Adrian Kempe · Snap, 0.22 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:25CARSebastian AhoGWGAssists: Seth Jarvis, Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.13 xG2–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 0:32CARJordan Martinook: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 6:21LAKKevin Fiala: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:01LAKCorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 0:01LAKCorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 0:01CARJordan Martinook: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 2:39LAKJoel Edmundson: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 9:19CARTaylor Hall: Embellishment2 min
  8. P2 9:19LAKBrandt Clarke: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 19:20LAKBrandt Clarke: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:20CARJordan Martinook: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 6:18CARJalen Chatfield: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 7:46LAKCorey Perry: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCAR
13Shots on goal34
1.6Expected goals4.2
37Shot attempts77
33Faceoffs won33
2Power plays4
14Penalty minutes10
25Hits11
25Blocked shots12
12Giveaways13
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. Fiala – Byfield – Kuzmenko9:30

    xG 0.24–0.28 (46%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Malott – Helenius – Ward6:17

    xG 0.15–0.25 (38%)attempts 3–10goals 1–0

  3. Kopitar – Armia – Moore7:47

    xG 0.04–0.17 (20%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Kopitar – Fiala – Kempe2:33

    xG 0.01–0.29 (5%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Clarke4:29

    xG 0.28–0.20 (58%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Doughty – Edmundson5:35

    xG 0.13–0.11 (54%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Ceci – Clarke2:05

    xG 0.02–0.02 (49%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Martinook – Ehlers11:47

    xG 0.57–0.16 (78%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0

  2. Aho – Svechnikov – Jarvis8:34

    xG 0.85–0.52 (62%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Jankowski – Carrier – Kotkaniemi6:19

    xG 0.28–0.12 (70%)attempts 10–3goals 0–1

  4. Hall – Stankoven – Blake10:06

    xG 0.53–0.51 (51%)attempts 8–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSlavin – Chatfield16:13

    xG 0.86–0.43 (67%)attempts 19–14goals 0–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Nikishin11:37

    xG 0.71–0.29 (71%)attempts 15–5goals 1–1

  3. Walker – Miller14:05

    xG 0.79–0.66 (55%)attempts 18–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 4.2 xGLAK 1.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #417 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.77 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 88% of the time.

CAR winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).