Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 4, 2026·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Boston Bruins 4, Florida Panthers 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BOS2901127021429
FLA1831005032526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:22FLAEetu LuostarinenUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:18BOSMichael EyssimontAssists: Alex Steeves, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:43BOSMichael EyssimontAssists: Marat Khusnutdinov, Andrew Peeke · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:30FLAUvis BalinskisPPAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Anton Lundell · Snap, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 2:47FLAMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Anton Lundell, Uvis Balinskis · Backhand, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:33FLAAnton LundellSHAssists: Sam Reinhart · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:52BOSMark KastelicAssists: Charlie McAvoy, Hampus Lindholm · Deflected, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:30BOSCasey MittelstadtPPAssists: David Pastrnak, Morgan Geekie · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Anton Lundell scored
  2. 2. BOS Viktor Arvidsson scored
  3. 3. FLA Sam Reinhart stopped
  4. 4. BOS Marat Khusnutdinov stopped
  5. 5. FLA Matthew Tkachuk stopped
  6. 6. FLA Brad Marchand scored
  7. 7. BOS Casey Mittelstadt stopped
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 10:33BOSMichael Eyssimont: Unsportsmanlike conduct bench2 min
  2. P1 10:33FLASandis Vilmanis: Illegal check to head2 min
  3. P1 10:33BOSJonathan Aspirot: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 15:06FLAAaron Ekblad: Interference2 min
  5. P1 19:07BOSMatthew Poitras: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P1 19:07FLASam Reinhart: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P1 19:07BOSTanner Jeannot: Fighting5 min · PPG
  8. P1 19:07FLAA.J. Greer: Fighting5 min
  9. P1 0:00BOSNikita Zadorov: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 2:22BOSViktor Arvidsson: Hooking2 min
  11. P2 12:25FLAEetu Luostarinen: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  12. P2 15:06FLANiko Mikkola: Cross checking2 min
  13. P2 16:59FLAEetu Luostarinen: Slashing2 min
  14. P2 18:23FLAEvan Rodrigues: Roughing2 min
  15. P2 18:23BOSMichael Eyssimont: Slashing2 min
  16. P3 4:50FLAGustav Forsling: Tripping2 min
  17. P3 10:21FLACarter Verhaeghe: Slashing2 min · PPG
  18. P3 15:43FLAEetu Luostarinen: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundell won the faceoff against Khusnutdinov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSFLA
29Shots on goal26
3.7Expected goals4.1
68Shot attempts60
38Faceoffs won35
7Power plays3
17Penalty minutes25
24Hits26
12Blocked shots20
21Giveaways16
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestArvidsson – Mittelstadt – Minten8:52

    xG 0.42–0.34 (55%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Kuraly – Eyssimont – Steeves5:31

    xG 0.06–0.11 (36%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  3. Jeannot – Kastelic – Poitras7:55

    xG 0.02–0.25 (8%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Pastrnak – Geekie – Khusnutdinov10:00

    xG 0.14–0.40 (26%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Lohrei8:21

    xG 0.51–0.13 (79%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. Lindholm – McAvoy5:39

    xG 0.13–0.01 (90%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Aspirot – Lohrei2:37

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwindt – Samoskevich – Vilmanis2:04

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Marchand – Verhaeghe – Rodrigues5:10

    xG 0.22–0.09 (70%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Bennett – Tkachuk – Luostarinen3:32

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  4. Verhaeghe – Reinhart – Lundell5:14

    xG 0.14–0.07 (67%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling12:58

    xG 0.75–0.31 (71%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  2. Petry – Bjornfot7:38

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Forsling3:19

    xG 0.11–0.04 (72%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.1 xGBOS 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLABOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #85 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.46 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).