Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 4, 2026·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Minnesota Wild 6, Nashville Predators 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

NSH winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN3151711912643
NSH3121151701535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:49MINMatt BoldyAssists: Zach Bogosian, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:39MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, Mats Zuccarello · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P1 9:26NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Roman Josi, Jonathan Marchessault · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P1 12:58MINMatt BoldyAssists: Quinn Hughes, Brock Faber · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P1 16:45NSHSteven StamkosPPAssists: Filip Forsberg, Ryan O'Reilly · Slap, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P1 18:21NSHErik HaulaAssists: Jonathan Marchessault, Nick Perbix · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–3
  7. P2 0:41NSHLuke EvangelistaAssists: Steven Stamkos, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P2 16:06MINYakov TreninUnassisted · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. P3 15:14MINVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Jake Middleton, Danila Yurov · Wrist, 0.01 xG5–4
  10. P3 15:48NSHRoman JosiAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–5
  11. OT 4:14MINJared SpurgeonGWGAssists: Matt Boldy, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.15 xG6–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:31NSHSteven Stamkos: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:16MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:35NSHAdam Wilsby: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 13:35MINVinnie Hinostroza: Fighting5 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:20MINKirill Kaprizov: Holding2 min
  6. P2 18:06MINQuinn Hughes: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 1:19NSHRyan O'Reilly: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Hartman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINNSH
43Shots on goal35
4.0Expected goals3.2
78Shot attempts62
25Faceoffs won36
2Power plays3
11Penalty minutes9
26Hits14
12Blocked shots17
16Giveaways17
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestTarasenko – Trenin – Yurov10:27

    xG 1.50–0.34 (82%)attempts 17–10goals 2–0

  2. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy11:19

    xG 1.04–0.78 (57%)attempts 20–13goals 2–2

  3. Pitlick – Hinostroza – Sturm6:27

    xG 0.07–0.12 (37%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov14:38

    xG 0.46–0.78 (37%)attempts 15–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHughes – Faber20:11

    xG 2.28–0.65 (78%)attempts 33–15goals 1–1

  2. Bogosian – Hunt11:37

    xG 0.50–0.51 (49%)attempts 15–14goals 1–1

  3. Spurgeon – Middleton14:18

    xG 0.47–0.69 (40%)attempts 17–16goals 2–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – O'Reilly – Evangelista13:14

    xG 0.74–0.38 (66%)attempts 20–13goals 2–1

  2. Jost – Schaefer – Wood5:53

    xG 0.20–0.13 (60%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. McCarron – Bunting – Smith9:38

    xG 0.22–0.60 (27%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

  4. Haula – Marchessault – Forsberg12:10

    xG 0.68–1.76 (28%)attempts 11–24goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Skjei22:49

    xG 1.31–0.91 (59%)attempts 24–24goals 1–1

  2. Wilsby – Blankenburg6:30

    xG 0.09–0.16 (37%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

  3. Perbix – Wilsby4:03

    xG 0.11–0.35 (24%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.2 xGMIN 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #20 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.75 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

NSH winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).