Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 28, 2026·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Edmonton Oilers 4, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

SJS winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM191728424
SJS31401326533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:34SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Will Smith · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:07SJSMichael MisaPPAssists: Tyler Toffoli · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:51EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Evan Bouchard · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:05SJSBarclay GoodrowAssists: Zack Ostapchuk, John Klingberg · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:49EDMEvan BouchardAssists: Connor McDavid, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 2:54EDMTrent FredericAssists: Matt Savoie · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:30SJSAlexander WennbergAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Mario Ferraro · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:13EDMJake WalmanAssists: Connor McDavid, Evan Bouchard · Slap, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. P3 9:27SJSShakir MukhamadullinGWGAssists: William Eklund, Michael Misa · Slap, 0.04 xG4–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 3:51SJSKiefer Sherwood: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 9:39EDMSpencer Stastney: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:16SJSPhilipp Kurashev: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:10EDMKasperi Kapanen: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 18:48SJSVincent Desharnais: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ostapchuk won the faceoff against Henrique
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSJS
24Shots on goal33
3.1Expected goals3.7
53Shot attempts58
31Faceoffs won29
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
24Hits22
10Blocked shots15
19Giveaways22
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestDraisaitl – Roslovic – Savoie4:15

    xG 0.24–0.15 (62%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid5:13

    xG 0.12–0.03 (78%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid7:30

    xG 0.64–0.67 (49%)attempts 9–9goals 2–4

  4. Roslovic – Frederic – Savoie4:47

    xG 0.17–0.23 (42%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard13:46

    xG 0.46–0.34 (58%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  2. Emberson – Stastney13:44

    xG 0.62–0.95 (39%)attempts 12–16goals 1–1

  3. Nurse – Walman17:02

    xG 0.38–1.24 (24%)attempts 16–23goals 1–2

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestSherwood – Smith – Celebrini13:29

    xG 1.79–0.42 (81%)attempts 27–10goals 1–1

  2. Toffoli – Eklund – Misa8:10

    xG 0.24–0.05 (84%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Goodrow – Ostapchuk – Regenda7:32

    xG 0.23–0.10 (70%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

  4. Wennberg – Kurashev – Graf10:29

    xG 0.13–0.75 (15%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Klingberg15:56

    xG 1.31–0.62 (68%)attempts 27–12goals 2–2

  2. Ferraro – Mukhamadullin16:13

    xG 0.76–0.16 (83%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

  3. Orlov – Desharnais2:55

    xG 0.02–0.02 (43%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.7 xGEDM 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #58 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.48 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

SJS winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).