Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 5, 2026·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Boston Bruins 3, Nashville Predators 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 76% of the time.

NSH winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS091628323
NSH1841714629

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:53NSHNicolas HagueAssists: Ozzy Wiesblatt, Fedor Svechkov · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:24NSHMatthew WoodSHAssists: Nick Perbix · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:30BOSMorgan GeekiePPAssists: Charlie McAvoy, Elias Lindholm · Slap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:18NSHErik HaulaAssists: Brady Skjei, Steven Stamkos · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:37NSHFilip ForsbergPPGWGAssists: Steven Stamkos, Ryan Ufko · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P2 14:44NSHMatthew WoodAssists: Roman Josi, Filip Forsberg · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–5
  7. P3 6:05BOSCharlie McAvoyAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Pavel Zacha · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–5
  8. P3 15:32BOSViktor ArvidssonAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Pavel Zacha · Slap, 0.06 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:33NSHLuke EvangelistaENAssists: Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.65 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 10:59BOSDavid Pastrnak: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 15:58NSHErik Haula: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:18NSHMatthew Wood: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 19:18BOSMark Kastelic: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 19:59NSHErik Haula: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:26NSHNicolas Hague: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 10:53BOSTanner Jeannot: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  8. P2 14:44BOSMichael Eyssimont: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  9. P3 3:33BOSMark Kastelic: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 6:51BOSMarat Khusnutdinov: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 9:55NSHFedor Svechkov: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zacha won the faceoff against Wood
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSNSH
23Shots on goal29
2.4Expected goals4.1
59Shot attempts50
38Faceoffs won23
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
27Hits23
15Blocked shots18
15Giveaways10
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestArvidsson – Zacha – Mittelstadt8:36

    xG 0.63–0.19 (77%)attempts 11–4goals 2–0

  2. Lindholm – Pastrnak – Khusnutdinov6:08

    xG 0.13–0.02 (89%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Lindholm – Pastrnak – Geekie4:19

    xG 0.19–0.11 (64%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  4. Eyssimont – Geekie – Minten4:17

    xG 0.13–0.20 (38%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – McAvoy5:36

    xG 0.30–0.06 (83%)attempts 4–2goals 2–0

  2. Zadorov – Lohrei4:33

    xG 0.12–0.10 (54%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Zadorov – McAvoy8:19

    xG 0.25–0.28 (47%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestForsberg – Evangelista – Wood7:29

    xG 0.47–0.19 (71%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Jost – L'Heureux – Kemell5:29

    xG 0.23–0.03 (88%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Wiesblatt – Svechkov – Schaefer7:14

    xG 0.22–0.35 (39%)attempts 2–7goals 1–1

  4. Stamkos – Haula – Marchessault8:18

    xG 0.17–0.53 (24%)attempts 3–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Barron2:12

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Hague – Perbix3:00

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  3. Hague – Ufko2:09

    xG 0.11–0.08 (56%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 4.1 xGBOS 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #374 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.99 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 76% of the time.

NSH winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).