Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 6, 2026·United Center, Chicago

Vancouver Canucks 6, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 61% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN370639622
CHI2711006323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:08CHIRyan DonatoAssists: Frank Nazar · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 2:08VANDrew O'ConnorAssists: Tom Willander, Marcus Pettersson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 2:32VANJake DeBruskAssists: Zeev Buium, Elias Pettersson · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P1 6:32VANTeddy BluegerAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Max Sasson · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–1
  5. P1 12:00CHIIlya MikheyevAssists: Oliver Moore, Tyler Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:17CHIFrank NazarAssists: Alex Vlasic, Ilya Mikheyev · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 2:40VANBrock BoeserPPGWGAssists: Linus Karlsson, Jake DeBrusk · Bat, 0.10 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:34VANMax SassonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.73 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:44VANBrock BoeserENAssists: Marco Rossi, Filip Hronek · Wrist, 0.31 xG6–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 14:38VANAatu Räty: Interference2 min
  2. P1 18:30VANZeev Buium: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:00CHISam Rinzel: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 2:11VANFilip Hronek: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 2:11CHIAndrew Mangiapane: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 5:46CHIEthan Del Mastro: Holding2 min
  7. P2 10:09VANTom Willander: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 12:05CHIRyan Donato: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 1:36CHIAlex Vlasic: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Blueger won the faceoff against Bedard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCHI
22Shots on goal23
2.6Expected goals3.3
39Shot attempts56
37Faceoffs won18
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
20Hits17
8Blocked shots4
13Giveaways13
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBlueger – Karlsson – Sasson7:14

    xG 0.31–0.18 (63%)attempts 5–4goals 1–1

  2. Boeser – Rossi – Ohgren8:58

    xG 0.35–0.40 (47%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. DeBrusk – Pettersson – Hoglander6:25

    xG 0.25–0.35 (41%)attempts 7–4goals 1–2

  4. Kane – O'Connor – Räty6:35

    xG 0.10–0.81 (10%)attempts 1–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHronek – Pettersson14:07

    xG 0.65–0.28 (70%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  2. Pettersson – Hronek2:05

    xG 0.00–0.21 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Pettersson – Willander15:05

    xG 0.32–0.74 (30%)attempts 10–15goals 2–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Greene – Bedard12:55

    xG 0.57–0.32 (64%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Bertuzzi – Mikheyev – Moore4:19

    xG 0.36–0.26 (58%)attempts 5–6goals 1–1

  3. Teravainen – Donato – Nazar6:46

    xG 0.26–0.18 (60%)attempts 5–2goals 1–1

  4. Mangiapane – Slaggert – Moore4:25

    xG 0.20–0.14 (59%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – Del Mastro2:40

    xG 0.57–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Crevier10:04

    xG 0.82–0.26 (76%)attempts 11–8goals 2–1

  3. Vlasic – Levshunov2:28

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.3 xGVAN 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #239 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.70 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 61% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).