Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 6, 2026·Honda Center, Anaheim

Montréal Canadiens 5, Anaheim Ducks 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 56% of the time.

ANA winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MTL2401436041528
ANA21211328002633

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:39ANACutter GauthierAssists: Leo Carlsson, Chris Kreider · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 1:01MTLNick SuzukiAssists: Cole Caufield, Juraj Slafkovský · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 3:33MTLLane HutsonPPAssists: Juraj Slafkovský, Nick Suzuki · Snap, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P1 11:56ANARadko GudasAssists: Frank Vatrano, Ryan Poehling · Slap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:15ANAJackson LaCombePPAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Chris Kreider · Slap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:35ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Chris Kreider, Jacob Trouba · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:41MTLCole CaufieldAssists: Noah Dobson, Lane Hutson · Slap, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:47MTLAlexandre CarrierAssists: Jake Evans, Zachary Bolduc · Snap, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. P3 13:04MTLCole CaufieldAssists: Noah Dobson, Lane Hutson · Tip-in, 0.08 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:18ANAChris KreiderAssists: Jacob Trouba, Jackson LaCombe · Tip-in, 0.10 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Leo Carlsson stopped
  2. 2. MTL Cole Caufield stopped
  3. 3. ANA Beckett Sennecke stopped
  4. 4. MTL Nick Suzuki stopped
  5. 5. ANA Mason McTavish stopped
  6. 6. MTL Kirby Dach stopped
  7. 7. ANA Cutter Gauthier scored
  8. 8. MTL Ivan Demidov scored
  9. 9. ANA Chris Kreider stopped
  10. 10. ANA Alex Killorn scored
  11. 11. MTL Oliver Kapanen stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:53ANALeo Carlsson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:37MTLAlexandre Carrier: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 3:43ANARadko Gudas: Interference2 min
  4. P2 6:54ANAJacob Trouba: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 12:03MTLJosh Anderson: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. OT 2:59ANAOlen Zellweger: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← MTL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Suzuki won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLANA
28Shots on goal33
3.6Expected goals3.2
67Shot attempts60
33Faceoffs won27
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
21Hits17
15Blocked shots12
17Giveaways15
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestEvans – Dach – Bolduc11:48

    xG 0.71–0.17 (81%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Gallagher – Danault – Anderson8:04

    xG 0.36–0.34 (51%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Newhook – Kapanen – Demidov7:24

    xG 0.24–0.39 (38%)attempts 3–10goals 0–1

  4. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský12:15

    xG 0.63–1.03 (38%)attempts 16–18goals 3–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDobson – Hutson13:16

    xG 1.15–0.73 (61%)attempts 26–11goals 3–1

  2. Matheson – Dobson4:12

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Dobson – Guhle2:49

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKreider – Gauthier – Carlsson11:50

    xG 1.17–0.43 (73%)attempts 25–10goals 2–1

  2. Killorn – Poehling – Sennecke10:24

    xG 0.70–0.44 (61%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

  3. Killorn – McTavish – Sennecke3:36

    xG 0.02–0.08 (21%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

  4. Johnston – Viel – Washe9:03

    xG 0.26–0.37 (41%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – LaCombe20:48

    xG 1.53–0.64 (70%)attempts 22–16goals 2–2

  2. Moore – Mintyukov11:33

    xG 0.40–0.49 (45%)attempts 9–8goals 0–2

  3. Gudas – Zellweger14:04

    xG 0.45–0.59 (43%)attempts 15–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.2 xGMTL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #15 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.09 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 56% of the time.

ANA winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).